100mm MAF for LSX
11-26-2006, 08:56 AM
#22
5 year bitches!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Pittsburgh!!!!!!!! Pa
Posts: 4,890
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally Posted by CRAZYCUTER4.8
Is he doing his own tuning? If not how will he compensate for the changes that will naturally occur with the ve table everytime the weather changes?
I am in no way knocking SD tuning, I am in SD now but evertime the weather changes your ve calculations are off. Plus the mathmatics for figuring the MAF is much more precise with a faster sampling rate (record the waves on a lab scope & play them back). If speed density only was the way to go
then i find it hard to believe GM would not have gone to MAF+SD.
I am in no way knocking SD tuning, I am in SD now but evertime the weather changes your ve calculations are off. Plus the mathmatics for figuring the MAF is much more precise with a faster sampling rate (record the waves on a lab scope & play them back). If speed density only was the way to go
then i find it hard to believe GM would not have gone to MAF+SD.
11-26-2006, 10:35 AM
#23
Originally Posted by CRAZYCUTER4.8
you are 100% correct in that regard.
They are talking about deleting the MAF all together. In that case there would be no IAT sensor.
They are talking about deleting the MAF all together. In that case there would be no IAT sensor.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lucas287
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
31
01-12-2021 06:18 AM
