111 lsa and driveability?
11-28-2006, 04:49 PM
#12
Adkoonerstrator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Deep in the seedy underworld of Koonerville
Posts: 21,436
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally Posted by Ruffrider5.3
EFI live will not tune your ride. It is for logging purposes only.
11-28-2006, 05:05 PM
#14
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by treyZ28
might want to edit it to say more negative = more overlap
People get confused when you put a negative value for overlap. "How can you have negative overlap?" In other words, there is none @ this part of the lobe.
Like I said, I know you are aware of all of this, so just tell me what makes it more clear and I can restate it.
11-28-2006, 05:12 PM
#15
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Dallas, North Mexico
Posts: 1,842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sorry, I was misreading it.
You said
but did the math on the 114 LSA cam first. Brain Fart/Assumption.
I thought you were saying the 114 has more overlap.
It is kinda misleading because neither has overlap. the 114 cam has an 8 degree space between lobes and the 110 has the intake lobe start right when the exhuast lobe ends.
You said
The more negative you go, the less overlap you have. So, the 220/220 - 110 cam has 8* more overlap than the 220/220 - 114.
I thought you were saying the 114 has more overlap.
It is kinda misleading because neither has overlap. the 114 cam has an 8 degree space between lobes and the 110 has the intake lobe start right when the exhuast lobe ends.
11-28-2006, 05:33 PM
#17
Im gonna go ahead and throw in my recommendation even though its futile.
but what the hell Im at work and bored
You can have a low lsa with less duration and make more power and have better drivability, especially with xfi type lobes and the stock heads and intake.
216/222 110/108 .58 lift xfi lobe
but what the hell Im at work and bored
You can have a low lsa with less duration and make more power and have better drivability, especially with xfi type lobes and the stock heads and intake.
216/222 110/108 .58 lift xfi lobe
Last edited by 02sierraz71_5.3; 11-28-2006 at 05:38 PM.
11-28-2006, 05:37 PM
#18
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 02sierraz71_5.3
Im gonna go ahead and throw in my recommendation even though its futile.
but what the hell Im at work and bored
You can have a low lsa with less duration and make more power and have better drivability, especially with xe type lobes and the stock heads and intake.
216/222 110/108 .58 lift xfi lobe
but what the hell Im at work and bored
You can have a low lsa with less duration and make more power and have better drivability, especially with xe type lobes and the stock heads and intake.
216/222 110/108 .58 lift xfi lobe
11-28-2006, 05:41 PM
#20
Originally Posted by 1slow01Z71
I had no driveability problems with the 222/224 112 it just needed a 3400 stall to really come out the hole good. I wouldnt be shy about running that cam just be prepared to run a decent size stall with it, a 3K isnt going to get it done in your ec truck, unless you have just have a freak truck.