Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

1500hd Sucks!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-27-2007, 09:31 PM
  #21  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
nonnieselman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Crystal Springs, MS
Posts: 14,068
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I can get 21-22mpg out of my truck.. but in town drivin it pretty rough keeping the rpms about 2000 i get about 15 or so.. on the interstate ive gotten 21 a few times and 22 every now and again..

Im still not through tuning it though, dont have DFCO or anything like that Enabled.

But i have 275/60/16 tires... 29" Tall and 11" Wide with 3.42 gears, Speedo calibrated with GPS.. 70mph is 2000 rpms exactly.
Ive thought about goin with a 30 or a 31" tire but most of my driving is in town and country roads. so i cruise at about 55mph most of the time..


My buddy at work has a CCSB 1500hd 4x4 6.0 and he gets a best of 14 on the interstate...
Old 08-29-2007, 08:39 PM
  #22  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Moncton,N-B, Canada
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I did one a while back w/3.73 gears and 245 tires.I tuned the VE.But when I activated the MAF,it was spark knocking like crazy.
It was doing it before,but not as bad.That why he ask me to have a look at it.
The maf was off by 8%-10%+ everywhere at 35%+ throttle.
After we set the maf and the PE,It ran completely different,a lot better(could not have been worse for sure).He hauls a 28-30ft trailer.He said he got 12mpg with the trailer.I don't remember him saying anything about MPG when he's empty.Don't know if you looked at the MAF allready.If not,have a look.
Good luck
Old 08-29-2007, 09:13 PM
  #23  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 3,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I just ran a whole can of seafoam through the pcv. It would idle down to 250 rpms when I let it suck in too much at once and would quickly jump to 3,000rpms and idle there for a minute. I got down to the last 8 ounces or so and just stuck the tube to the bottom of the cup trying to kill it. It took maybe 2 seconds to suck in the entire cup till nothing was left and it didnt even stumble. lol Anyway, i killed it and let it soak 12 miutes. It fired right back up and only had a very slight haze out the tail pipe for maybe one minute. It did idle rough the first couple minutes but cleared up. I tried some full throttle launches and DAMN, for the first time it jumped sideways spinning both tires about 5 feet and went to one tire for another 10 feet. It has never spun the tires before, even with the stock tiny 245's. I am in Brownsville right now so no open streets to get some speed up, but 0-50mph I didnt hear a bit of knock. I may be here a couple more weeks so I wont know if the milage is up any till my drive back to Houston.


I really am impressed with the results but I sure thought the exhaust would smoke more than it did. Maybe it wasnt all that dirty.
Old 08-30-2007, 09:25 AM
  #24  
TECH Fanatic
 
shandy294's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Cibolo Tx
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Those are some dramatic results from just Sea Foaming the intake! I just did mine 5 days ago with about 1/2 can and it didn't even smoke that I could see. I didn't kill and soak the engine though. I ran a can through the tank a few weeks ago and didn't notice any difference from either procedure. I guess it didn't need it.

I know a guy who has a 03 SSS and it gets 13mpg all the time. I don't know what his gearing is.

My mild-mannered truck gets about 21 hwy on cruise at just under 2k rpm.
Old 08-30-2007, 04:28 PM
  #25  
TECH Apprentice
 
yurs78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Juda
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have an '03 1500HD CC with the quadsteer. So the set up should be almost exact. First of all I don't think that the truck only weighs 5600 lbs. I think it's around 6400 or a little more (that's what mine was on the scales). So there is a lot more weight there than you'd think. My truck was crap for milage too when I got it. I got a the 89 octane tune from nelson and that helped a lot. At the speeds you're talking about I'm at 14-15 mpg, and I've never heard better from a truck that big and the 4.10's. I had a '99 2500 regular cab with the same drivetrain and 3.73's and that did average a lot better milage than this CC. The weight and the gears really hurt it.
Old 08-31-2007, 06:37 PM
  #26  
On The Tree
 
Jeanyus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Auburn Ca.
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My 06 1500 HD 6.0 with 4.10's. Gets 14 MPG city and 16 MPG at 70 MPH highway. When I hook the 22 foot 5600 lb camping trailer to it I get 11 mpg.
Old 08-31-2007, 09:15 PM
  #27  
Launching!
 
SS Crew's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: In a van, down by the river
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I had an 04 2500 non HD ( same as 1500 HD) Quadrasteer with the 6.0 and 3.73 gears. I got between 12 and 13.5 on the highway running about 75 - 80 mph. After I got a 91 Hot Tune from Westers my mileage on the highway went up to 14.5. I got popped speeding and did the remainder of the trip not exceeding 70 and pulled almost 16 mpg.

It seems that if you keep the rpms down it really makes a difference. I had an 99 with a 5.3 and running at about 80 mph I could still pull 17+ mpg. The 6.0's are just plain ol' gas pigs.
Old 09-01-2007, 11:01 AM
  #28  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Toonz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: DFW
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You guys have me wondering how bad my new Sierra Denali will be, it has the 6.0L and AWD. Not sure on the gears though since I haven't picked it up from the dealer yet.
Old 09-01-2007, 11:06 AM
  #29  
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (4)
 
TURBHOE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Jacksonville FL.
Posts: 6,318
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

what year? the new ones have the 6spd don't they?
Old 09-01-2007, 11:30 AM
  #30  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Toonz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: DFW
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It's an '06 but only has the 4 speed. Maybe a tranny swap should be the first mod on the list... have to wait and see.

Just found this quote online:

"The Denali is fitted with a 345-hp, 6.0-liter V-8, while the 1500HD is powered by a 300-hp, 6.0-liter V-8."

Wonder if that will make a difference...

Last edited by Toonz; 09-01-2007 at 11:49 AM.


Quick Reply: 1500hd Sucks!!!!!!!!!!!!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:42 PM.