GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

221 221 558 558 114 cam ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-19-2007 | 12:59 PM
  #1  
LARRY01Z28's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 0
From: waynesburg, KY.
Default 221 221 558 558 114 cam ?

221 221 558 558 114 cam, would a 2600 yank be to small for that cam?? in a 5.3 l 4x4 with 373 gears. thanks larry
Old 03-19-2007 | 03:23 PM
  #2  
Mangled03gmc's Avatar
Baltimore Whore
iTrader: (95)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 16,820
Likes: 2
From: In a van DOWN BY THE RIVER
Default

Should be enough for that cam...
Old 03-19-2007 | 04:03 PM
  #3  
BLACKND's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,123
Likes: 0
From: Alvin,TX
Default

I think it'd be a tad small personally. I mean it would run and wouldn't be all that bad, but for optimal performance, I'd say a 3000. I had a 2500 in my CC when I was running the comp 216/220~114 and It was just barely enough, it ran good times, but I knew I was leaving a lot on the table.

If your not worrying about optimal 60' times, then you could probably get by with it.
Old 03-19-2007 | 05:21 PM
  #4  
02sierraz71_5.3's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,473
Likes: 1
From: Cornelius, NC
Default

whats the icl?
Old 03-19-2007 | 06:17 PM
  #5  
98TAauto's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,316
Likes: 0
From: Warsaw, Va
Default

borderline.. i think it would be ok though in your light truck
Old 03-20-2007 | 06:37 AM
  #6  
LARRY01Z28's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 0
From: waynesburg, KY.
Default

Originally Posted by 02sierraz71_5.3
whats the icl?

i dont know???
Old 03-20-2007 | 06:37 AM
  #7  
LARRY01Z28's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 0
From: waynesburg, KY.
Default

its a 114 lsa is all i know.
Old 03-20-2007 | 08:58 AM
  #8  
12secSS's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,728
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by L33Z71
I think it'd be a tad small personally. I mean it would run and wouldn't be all that bad, but for optimal performance, I'd say a 3000. I had a 2500 in my CC when I was running the comp 216/220~114 and It was just barely enough, it ran good times, but I knew I was leaving a lot on the table.

If your not worrying about optimal 60' times, then you could probably get by with it.
I agree. The Yank 2600 was intended for stock vehicles. With a slightly bigger cam, I would opt for the 3000, unless you already have the 2600.
Old 03-20-2007 | 09:43 AM
  #9  
LARRY01Z28's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 0
From: waynesburg, KY.
Default

yeah ive already got the 2600. i wish i would have gotten the 3000, but the 2600 is really perfect for daily driving. and i put on alot of hwy miles. so i guess ill just stick with the 216 220. thanks everyone. larry
Old 03-20-2007 | 05:17 PM
  #10  
02sierraz71_5.3's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,473
Likes: 1
From: Cornelius, NC
Default

Originally Posted by LARRY01Z28
i dont know???
that makes a big difference with power band, more so than the lsa.
You need to find that out.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
thunder550
Trucks and SUV Classifieds
9
10-08-2015 04:53 PM
DrX
FORCED INDUCTION
31
08-19-2015 04:45 PM
fastjweb
Drag Racing
20
08-15-2015 10:47 AM
RONIN LSX
FUEL SYSTEMS
1
08-11-2015 12:03 AM
Ammadien
New Members
1
07-22-2015 08:50 PM



Quick Reply: 221 221 558 558 114 cam ?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:39 PM.