Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

3" PS Y-pipe no more

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-24-2008, 08:10 PM
  #1  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
cmb570's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 440
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink 3" PS Y-pipe no more

Well third times a charm. I never really liked the 3" PS y-pipe. I always thought it was too much for my little 5.3. Well..... I think I was right. I went with a true dual exhaust. Starting with my PS headers into 2.5 pipes. Each pipe is going to its own high flow cat before entering a magnaflow x-pipe. Then each pipe has its own magnaflow muffler, straight through design.... up over the axles and both pipes dump up high so you cant see pipes when truck is on the ground.
The throttle response is sooo much better. It pulls much better from a roll now too. Amazing how much difference an exhaust will make.
Old 11-24-2008, 08:13 PM
  #2  
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (13)
 
dlt76028's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Crowley, TX
Posts: 5,883
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

huh thats pretty cool. now go get it dynoed again and see if you gained torque
Old 11-24-2008, 08:16 PM
  #3  
11 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (31)
 
bluecajun5.3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Breaux Bridge, LA
Posts: 5,861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

actually you have it all backwards.
2.5" true duals is > 3" y pipe
Old 11-24-2008, 08:21 PM
  #4  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
cmb570's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 440
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thats the next plan to get proof on dyno. But no mistaken the difference Im feeling. Its not a small difference.... its night and day

My old exhaust was 3" PS y-pipe into single 2.5 pipe... into single in 19" magnaflow dual out. This was much louder and less responsive. I originally didnt have any cats, then added one and seemed like motor liked added back pressure
Old 11-24-2008, 08:22 PM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
GMCtrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 12,275
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

The OBX system has a 2.5" y pipe versus 3" on the pacesetter y. I noticed no difference down low with the 6.0. But I do believe the 3" is too much for a stockish 5.3. The pacesetter should make a little more power up top.
Old 11-24-2008, 08:40 PM
  #6  
TECH Resident
 
Leroy_454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ennis, Texas
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I dont think a 3" Y pipe is too much for a 5.3L. Now 3" duals ya, probably overkill. 2.5" duals have always worked well though; good to hear the results.
Old 11-24-2008, 10:08 PM
  #7  
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
budhayes3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hackensack, NJ
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Your original system sounds pretty mis-matched, big 3" pipes choking down into a single 2.5" pipe, scavenging must have been horrible. I also agree that a 3" y-pipe is a little excessive for a mild 5.3....2.5's into a single 3" merge sounds about right to me.
Old 11-24-2008, 11:00 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Noah Burns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

i had WAY WAY WAY better results with 2.5" true duals, mandrel bent, x pipe, dual bullets than i did with a big y pipe... AND it sounded much better with the duals... i'll be sticking to a y pipe setup on my new truck though, trying to stay as "stock" style as i can...
Old 11-24-2008, 11:25 PM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
GMCtrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 12,275
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Is the stock catback pipe hurting my performance with the pacesetter y pipe? I think the stock pipe is 2.75".
Old 11-24-2008, 11:36 PM
  #10  
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
budhayes3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hackensack, NJ
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GMCtrk
Is the stock catback pipe hurting my performance with the pacesetter y pipe? I think the stock pipe is 2.75".
Since you have a 6.0 I'm sure it's not helping any...not sure if you'd feel the difference between the 2.75 and 3.0 pipe in your butt-o-meter though
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
5.3lSilverado
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
4
09-20-2015 06:48 PM
Cowboy Tom
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
11
09-16-2015 09:35 AM
Tigger Welder
TOWING & OFFROAD PERFORMANCE
5
09-02-2015 08:17 AM
Layn22s
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
3
08-31-2015 03:43 PM
Gmc_sierra
GMT 900 Trucks General Discussion
7
08-28-2015 10:14 AM



Quick Reply: 3" PS Y-pipe no more



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:26 AM.