Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

370 vs 408?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-26-2013, 10:38 AM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
Cammed4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 370 vs 408?

Hey guys, Please correct me if I am wrong, both of this setups are made from a 6.0L block right? 370 you replace pistons with a bigger size and 408 are pistons + stroke lenght right?
I have been reading much about how to get to 400rwhp in a 5.3 and it seems kind of hard cause I have done pretty much I can do for mine and I still am far from 400rwhp.. The point is, I think its time to improve to a either 370 or 408 setup, I want to stay N/A for now.. I would love to get a turbo in my setup BUT I do a lot of sand drags (100 yards) and I am affraid "Turbo lag" would be an issue here..
So long story short, I need a fast revving-high torque engine.. Should I go with a bullet proof 370 or 408???
Please guys any advice would be greatly appreciated!
Old 10-26-2013, 10:47 AM
  #2  
TECH Regular
 
AkSSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: North Pole, Ak
Posts: 406
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

There is no turbo lag on a proper staged start. Just saying.

I have a 370 only because I didn't know about the 408 crank when I bought my rotating assembly and that crank had just come out. If I could do it again I would have gone 408.
Old 10-26-2013, 11:06 AM
  #3  
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
LsF-150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yep, i would do 408 also, could split the difference and do a 383 with your 5.3 if you dont already have a 6.0
Old 10-26-2013, 12:48 PM
  #4  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
batboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: middle of nowhere, Kansas
Posts: 1,401
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cammed4ever
Hey guys, Please correct me if I am wrong, both of this setups are made from a 6.0L block right?
Yes, both the 370 and 408 use the 6.0 truck iron block and both are bored out to 4.030". The 370 uses the stock stroke of 3.62 where as the 408 uses a 4" stroke rotating assembly.
Old 10-26-2013, 01:01 PM
  #5  
TECH Junkie
 
ZO6Ted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 3,293
Received 254 Likes on 165 Posts
Default

Agreed, 0 turbo lag when staged properly. Boosted the 370, NA I would do the 408.
Old 10-26-2013, 03:34 PM
  #6  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
batboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: middle of nowhere, Kansas
Posts: 1,401
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Do you people that claim zero turbo lag actually have a turbo? I have a turbo in my Cobalt SS and it's a small twin scroll unit that has minimal lag, but it still has lag down in the low rpm until boost build up. That's the nature of a turbo. Sure, there are ways to minimize it, but I would never say "zero" lag.

Turbo lag is the time required to change power output in response to a throttle change, noticed as a hesitation or slowed throttle response when accelerating from idle as compared to a naturally aspirated engine. This is due to the time needed for the exhaust system and turbocharger to generate the required boost. Inertia, friction, and compressor load are the primary contributors to turbo lag.
Old 10-26-2013, 04:46 PM
  #7  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
Cammed4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think that running in 4LO(like we always do) will help a lot with turbo lag cause the engine is reving REALLY FAST in each gear, but wouldnt that mess up with the blow off valve and stuff like that? I dont know much about turbo other than I would LOVE to have one, I was just trying to stay away from that "lag" cause such a short race.. (5.60 sec in 1/16th of a mile [sand] is my current time)
So what should I be looking fw to? 408 or 383 low compression with a quick turbo? Any ideas or numbers on turbo size I should use, a/r, etc etc??
Thanks again!
Old 10-26-2013, 05:00 PM
  #8  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
LS1TRUCKGUY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Deer Park Texas
Posts: 2,452
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Just depends what your goals are. You can turbo that 5.3 of yours and make just as much and more power than a n/a 408. My stock 5.3 with a comp 212/218 low lift cam and a trick turbo kit on 9lbs boost made 460/480 through heavy 20" wheels.
Old 10-26-2013, 05:08 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
gamble686's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Keep in mind that turbo lag is an issue when trying to punch it from a roll or when not stalling up the motor. I doubt that people stalling to 3k at the line are noticing any turbo lag when speced out correctly.
Old 10-26-2013, 06:23 PM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Blackpanther99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Baytown, TX
Posts: 6,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZO6Ted
Agreed, 0 turbo lag when staged properly. Boosted the 370, NA I would do the 408.
This^


Quick Reply: 370 vs 408?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:35 AM.