Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

4.8 to 5.3, requirements?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-23-2005, 09:26 PM
  #21  
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (4)
 
TURBHOE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Jacksonville FL.
Posts: 6,318
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mjhoward
Well, one of the sources of info is obviously wrong. ???

yeah thats kinda what i was thinking lol. i would think the second was the off one becouse that would make for a really short piston and probably put the pin up in the oil ring area and i don't think they would do all that just to put a long rod in there doesn't make since to me but i dunno.
Old 08-23-2005, 10:57 PM
  #22  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
ls1ow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: DFW TX
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

but would be the real gain in doing all the work to just gain .5 liters???
Old 08-23-2005, 10:58 PM
  #23  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
ls1ow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: DFW TX
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i mean is it really worth all the work
Old 08-24-2005, 12:30 AM
  #24  
TECH Veteran
 
zippy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

it's a tough call, but if you drive a 4.8L and a 5.3L there is quite a difference. much more torque and a noticable hp difference. mostly just the lower rpm is a ton better.
Old 08-24-2005, 10:16 AM
  #25  
On The Tree
iTrader: (5)
 
Diablo666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Mesa AZ
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ls1ow
i mean is it really worth all the work
it's worth the work if you don't want to swap blocks the 5.3 has a lot more torque and more potential i'm not gonna convert my 4.8 to a 5.3 'cause i'm building a stroker LS1 for my lil' devil
Old 08-24-2005, 05:45 PM
  #26  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
4.8shorty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

912jonathon, any results from looking up part #s? I think it would be worth it for me because I know my engine's been well taken care of, and changing the engine out would probably still be quite a bit more then the cost too change the crank/rods/pistons. As for power difference, I know on paper the 4.8 doesn't seem much different then the 5.3, but seat of the pants feel says their's a huge difference. That and if every bolt on adds a certain %, then you'd be getting more bang for your buck with the changes. Lastly, a cam would go in before resting the refreshed SB between the frame rails.
Old 08-24-2005, 06:06 PM
  #27  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
912jonathon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Lumber City, GA
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 4.8shorty
912jonathon, any results from looking up part #s? I think it would be worth it for me because I know my engine's been well taken care of, and changing the engine out would probably still be quite a bit more then the cost too change the crank/rods/pistons. As for power difference, I know on paper the 4.8 doesn't seem much different then the 5.3, but seat of the pants feel says their's a huge difference. That and if every bolt on adds a certain %, then you'd be getting more bang for your buck with the changes. Lastly, a cam would go in before resting the refreshed SB between the frame rails.
no sorry i rebuilt my transmission today only to put it back in a now i have no reverse. i will check first thing in the morning
Old 08-25-2005, 03:41 PM
  #28  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
912jonathon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Lumber City, GA
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

sorry, i have had no luck finding any answers. the part #'s are different on the entire bottom end though. i know the 5.3 has a 3.662 stroke and the 4.8 has a 3.268 stroke. my guess is you would have to change the rods and crank, but still not sure about the pistons. if you could use 4.8 pistons it would raise your comp. about 10.00-10.50.1 though. i think the simplist thing to do is just find a good 5.3 or 6.0 and stick it in. i will do more researching tommorrow
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dan Neumann
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
11
08-07-2022 09:06 AM
JordanH
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
9
08-08-2015 07:59 PM
03regcab sierra
Dynamometer Results & Comparisons
20
08-03-2015 12:11 AM
MS3Z
FUEL SYSTEMS
8
07-30-2015 06:17 PM
06 4.8
GM Parts Classifieds
2
07-15-2015 07:17 PM



Quick Reply: 4.8 to 5.3, requirements?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:28 PM.