PerformanceTrucks.net Forums

Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

4.8 v.s 5.3 or 6.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-03-2009, 11:46 PM
  #21  
9 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (16)
 
stock48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, Co/ Central, Ca
Posts: 3,655
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by team39763
I had a 226 cam, yank 3000, built trans, and 4.10's. I even did weight reduction.
What were the times, and what tires did you run?
stock48 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 04-04-2009, 12:23 AM
  #22  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
team39763's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
I ran 16.2 both times and I had on 285/50/20 street tires. Not a lot of spinning either.
team39763 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 04-04-2009, 12:32 AM
  #23  
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
budhayes3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hackensack, NJ
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by team39763
I ran 16.2 both times and I had on 285/50/20 street tires. Not a lot of spinning either.
That's godawful, were you runnin in 3 feet of water?
budhayes3 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 04-04-2009, 02:02 AM
  #24  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
GMCtrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 12,275
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default
14. 0 with a stock intenral 6.0, im trdiunk tgh now thnak you
GMCtrk is offline  
Reply Like
Old 04-04-2009, 02:08 AM
  #25  
Truck Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Wheatley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Sealy/Katy TX
Posts: 3,286
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by GMCtrk
14. 0 with a stock intenral 6.0, im trdiunk tgh now thnak you
Wheatley is offline  
Reply Like
Old 04-04-2009, 07:27 AM
  #26  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
sonoma43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Saint Joseph, MI
Posts: 1,279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by team39763
I ran 16.2 both times and I had on 285/50/20 street tires. Not a lot of spinning either.
was it tuned??? or was this motor in a military tank with no weight reduction?
sonoma43 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 04-04-2009, 10:30 AM
  #27  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
team39763's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
Nelson Performance installed the motor and tuned it. It was in my 2000 extended cab sportside. Allen said I had fuel problems(from having stock injectors I guess?).
team39763 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 04-04-2009, 10:33 AM
  #28  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
sonoma43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Saint Joseph, MI
Posts: 1,279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
at 16.2 you couldnt of been making enough power to run out of injector...well I guess the 2000's did only have 19lb/hr...but hell stock they run 16.2's
sonoma43 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 04-04-2009, 10:54 AM
  #29  
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
budhayes3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hackensack, NJ
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by sonoma43
at 16.2 you couldnt of been making enough power to run out of injector...well I guess the 2000's did only have 19lb/hr...but hell stock they run 16.2's
I think that only the 99's had the 19# injectors, and 00 and up are 24.7#
budhayes3 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 04-04-2009, 11:00 AM
  #30  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
sonoma43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Saint Joseph, MI
Posts: 1,279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by budhayes3
I think that only the 99's had the 19# injectors, and 00 and up are 24.7#
oh, I thought the 99 and 00 had the 19#er's....my bad
sonoma43 is offline  
Reply Like



Advanced Search
Quick Reply: 4.8 v.s 5.3 or 6.0


Reply Closed Thread Share

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:46 AM.