5.3 vs 243 Heads...Confusion
#12
TECH Resident
Originally Posted by pbraxton
and i was curious why the new 5.3's are making better numbers with those heads.
#14
TECH Addict
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Northeast, NJ
Posts: 2,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bore 3.78 gasket bore 3.91
Stroke 3.62
Chamber Vol 58.8
Compression Height -0.008
Piston dish Vol 7
Gasket thickness 0.045
Displacement volume -1.471179387
Gasket Volume 8.854378301
Swept Volume 665.7086726
Compression Volume 73.18319891
Compression Ratio 10.09646862
Stroke 3.62
Chamber Vol 58.8
Compression Height -0.008
Piston dish Vol 7
Gasket thickness 0.045
Displacement volume -1.471179387
Gasket Volume 8.854378301
Swept Volume 665.7086726
Compression Volume 73.18319891
Compression Ratio 10.09646862
#15
TECH Addict
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Northeast, NJ
Posts: 2,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ChevyThunder17
I *think* the piston protrudes .008" out of the deck, similar to the 5.7's. I'm not sure though.
#16
TECH Resident
iTrader: (45)
Originally Posted by tdrumm
Bore 3.78 gasket bore 3.91
Stroke 3.62
Chamber Vol 58.8
Compression Height -0.008
Piston dish Vol 7
Gasket thickness 0.045
Displacement volume -1.471179387
Gasket Volume 8.854378301
Swept Volume 665.7086726
Compression Volume 73.18319891
Compression Ratio 10.09646862
Stroke 3.62
Chamber Vol 58.8
Compression Height -0.008
Piston dish Vol 7
Gasket thickness 0.045
Displacement volume -1.471179387
Gasket Volume 8.854378301
Swept Volume 665.7086726
Compression Volume 73.18319891
Compression Ratio 10.09646862
#17
TECH Resident
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Taxachusetts
Posts: 810
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by colyneedsv8
the new 5.3's have flat top pistons and 9.9:1 compression, ls6 based heads, 90 mm TB/intake manifold and a slightly larger cam. these are the factors producing more power.
#18
TECH Addict
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Northeast, NJ
Posts: 2,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ChevyThunder17
Yep, I did +.008 for the deck height, didn't click the negative. Twice.