6.0 cam choice
03-23-2011, 09:52 PM
#31
Staging Lane
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Lawton, OK
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You'll lose low end with the 220. I lost low end with my 222/226. This is common sense, the cam moves the powerband up and increases valve overlap....less cylinder pressure down low to make torque. I have read that the low 210s duration cams work very well for 6.0 towing. I think Richard@WCCH had a 212/212 in his 6.0 truck and said it towed like raped ape.
03-24-2011, 09:55 AM
#35
Launching!
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Tuscaloosa, AL
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
03-24-2011, 05:00 PM
#38
Staging Lane
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Lawton, OK
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
03-24-2011, 05:59 PM
#39
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: van nuys CA
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If ur thinking about the 212/218 look into the lunati voodoo 60510. I ran it in my 5.3 no stall and loved it. Its on a 113 Lsa even more torque ealier. Ur gonna have a torqy 6.0...probably only pull to 6100. Mine pulled to 6200 but im a 5.3
03-25-2011, 12:44 AM
#40
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Guam
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I originally installed it in my 4.8, then went into my LQ9. I got the low lift for more torque and it worked well with LS6 springs. Price wasnt bad as well. Didnt want to go with a very high stall either. This is my DD so a TB TC was perfect for this cam IMO.