GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Any SS's With a 454" or 500" Stroker Ls?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-11-2011 | 04:31 PM
  #21  
rjwz28's Avatar
Man Motor club
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,623
Likes: 1
From: Sunniest city on Earth
Default

Adapt a KB 3.6 from the Camaro kit to an L92-headed beast?
Old 06-11-2011 | 05:02 PM
  #22  
slowfive0's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
From: Utica, MI
Default

200hp?!!!! Holy Chit! How much difference was there between the two setups? Ever run it at the track? Did it spit out 4L60s daily! Very nice

Originally Posted by Atomic
I had a 1900 on my camd 5.3, then put it on a high compression 408. Same exact blower. Going from the 5.3 to the 408 added about 200hp. With the same pulley the 5.3 was at 11lbs and the 408 was at 5lbs. The blower only moves a set volume, but as boost increase it becomes less efficient, ie takes more power to drive.
Old 06-11-2011 | 05:04 PM
  #23  
slowfive0's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
From: Utica, MI
Default

I've actually thought about that. What's involved? Accessory drive from car?? That sounds really cool, but I've heard that guy is a real a-hole to deal with......

Originally Posted by rjwz28
Adapt a KB 3.6 from the Camaro kit to an L92-headed beast?
Old 06-11-2011 | 05:59 PM
  #24  
rjwz28's Avatar
Man Motor club
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,623
Likes: 1
From: Sunniest city on Earth
Default

https://www.performancetrucks.net/fo...d.php?t=477697

Old 06-11-2011 | 07:10 PM
  #25  
slowfive0's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
From: Utica, MI
Default

OMG!!!! That looks like my next project

How do the blowers compare size wise to each other; i.e. TVS 1900 to KB 2.8???? Also, which one is more efficient? Seems like the Kenne Bells are capable of more power, but I've seen some pretty ugly threads in the past on this subject......It seems like people are split on which one is better

Thanks for the link!!!!

Old 06-11-2011 | 08:19 PM
  #26  
Spoolin's Avatar
GFYS and STFU
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 13,870
Likes: 4
From: Here and sometimes there too.
Default

1900 = 1.9 L
2300 = 2.3 L
2.8 = 2.8 L
etc...
Old 06-11-2011 | 08:29 PM
  #27  
slowfive0's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
From: Utica, MI
Default

Ahhh, so there 2.8 is actually not that small----

Don't they make a 4.2....

Originally Posted by Spoolin
1900 = 1.9 L
2300 = 2.3 L
2.8 = 2.8 L
etc...
Old 06-11-2011 | 08:36 PM
  #28  
Atomic's Avatar
I have a gauge for that
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,266
Likes: 394
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

Whipple does. I looked into big blower and it seems no one has been able to really push them to what they should make, mainly due to belt slip issues.
Old 06-11-2011 | 08:54 PM
  #29  
slowfive0's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
From: Utica, MI
Default

Anyone run a KB 2.8 or 3.6 on a Silverado SS or similar and run the number? That number being at least mid 11's.....

Do the KB's have a lot of belt slip problems and typically at what boost? Are they similar to Magnachargers?

Originally Posted by Atomic
Whipple does. I looked into big blower and it seems no one has been able to really push them to what they should make, mainly due to belt slip issues.
Old 06-11-2011 | 09:14 PM
  #30  
Atomic's Avatar
I have a gauge for that
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,266
Likes: 394
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

Kyle, kbracing, has had one for a while, and is selling it actually, might want to ask him



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:47 AM.