Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Anyone with the L92 heads on a 6.0L?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-19-2006, 01:03 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
Stampede4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Anyone with the L92 heads on a 6.0L?

What are your hp/tq increase?

Thanks.
Old 11-19-2006, 06:47 PM
  #2  
Tin Foil Hat Wearin' Fool
iTrader: (36)
 
1slow01Z71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 23,204
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

If its a stock 6L you are going to have bad valve shrouding, low speed driveability problems, and possibly spark plug fouling problems. Those heads are HUGE for a 6L in a heavy truck.
Old 11-19-2006, 08:13 PM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
TurboGibbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Decatur, AL
Posts: 5,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1slow01Z71
If its a stock 6L you are going to have bad valve shrouding, low speed driveability problems, and possibly spark plug fouling problems. Those heads are HUGE for a 6L in a heavy truck.
That is merely speculation of course. GM seems to think they will work fine on an engine with only 10 more ci than a 6.0. The difference of .060" on the bore is only .030 per side with is about the thickness of 7-8 sheets of paper. I would not call that bad valve shrouding if someone was to ask me.

If there was any loss of low speed tq most people wouldn't notice it since they would have a higher stall and the low speed losses would mostly be off idle.

This is coming from a person that used a set of 205cc heads on an engine that he was worried about low rpm tq.
It was 418 ci, ~11:1 comp, 237/242 duration cam I think, and a 3400 stall.


I am running L92's and a carb style intake on my 370ci set-up so we will know then. If I ever have time to put it together.
Old 11-19-2006, 08:16 PM
  #4  
5 year bitches!
iTrader: (7)
 
Quik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Pittsburgh!!!!!!!! Pa
Posts: 4,890
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

i have a set of L92s for the 408
Old 11-19-2006, 08:26 PM
  #5  
Tin Foil Hat Wearin' Fool
iTrader: (36)
 
1slow01Z71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 23,204
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TurboGibbs
That is merely speculation of course. GM seems to think they will work fine on an engine with only 10 more ci than a 6.0. The difference of .060" on the bore is only .030 per side with is about the thickness of 7-8 sheets of paper. I would not call that bad valve shrouding if someone was to ask me.

If there was any loss of low speed tq most people wouldn't notice it since they would have a higher stall and the low speed losses would mostly be off idle.

This is coming from a person that used a set of 205cc heads on an engine that he was worried about low rpm tq.
It was 418 ci, ~11:1 comp, 237/242 duration cam I think, and a 3400 stall.


I am running L92's and a carb style intake on my 370ci set-up so we will know then. If I ever have time to put it together.
Going by what many of the "reputable" engine builders on tech have said and you know as well as I do that when I ordered all that **** for my 418 that I didnt know very much at all about this kind of stuff and was "misguided" by the speed shop that I was dealing with. Get your POS running then lets see what tune you are singing.
Old 11-19-2006, 08:49 PM
  #6  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
02sierraz71_5.3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cornelius, NC
Posts: 3,473
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by TurboGibbs
I am running L92's and a carb style intake on my 370ci set-up so we will know then. If I ever have time to put it together.
Im interested in hearing results Ive been eyeing those heads and intake for myself

Last edited by 02sierraz71_5.3; 11-19-2006 at 09:00 PM.
Old 11-21-2006, 01:00 AM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
 
Bo185's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Beebe, Arkansas
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The new vortec max motor (L76) is a 6.0L and has the same heads as the L92 so looks like they should work on a Gen III 6.0L, you need the L92/L76 intake, though the GenIII won't work.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
USMCvet0311
SHOW & SHINE DISCUSSION
12
09-30-2015 10:34 AM
subeone
GM Parts Classifieds
1
08-19-2015 07:44 AM
Denali08
FORCED INDUCTION
12
08-09-2015 04:34 PM
USMCvet0311
NITROUS OXIDE
19
07-29-2015 01:28 PM
fcompean
FORCED INDUCTION
21
07-15-2015 09:55 PM



Quick Reply: Anyone with the L92 heads on a 6.0L?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:15 AM.