Anyone make 500rwhp with a roots or twin screw charger on a truck??
#41
Originally Posted by L-EATER
I made 489 last time on the rollers. If I had uncorked it there is no doubt I would have been over 500. That was with the stock crate motor with nothing but a cam. Soon I will be up and running again with a 30 over 6 liter with a little bigger cam and some ported heads, hopefully I can make 550 or so.
like i said. the radix seems to be able to just get over 500rwhp in an auto truck. that is prety impresive.
#42
Parish, I still have the regular 'ol Whipple like you used to have. I am intercooled now, which made 75 extra horses at the wheels. I am close to the airflow limits of this thing I know.
#43
Parish isnt kind of funny that it takes twice the torque 1000 VS 500, twice the boost 16 vs 8, more engine 408 and a 100 shot of nitrous to knock 1 second off your time compaired to a radix powered 6.0. These trucks are like lead weights it takes so much more power just to make it a second faster, I think we need to put or engines in Vegas or chevettes I am sure we would have 8 second machines.
#44
Originally Posted by L-EATER
Parish, I still have the regular 'ol Whipple like you used to have. I am intercooled now, which made 75 extra horses at the wheels. I am close to the airflow limits of this thing I know.
just foolin around i just dont want to misslead people. if someone wants 600rwhp maybe a radix in a perfect world on a perfect set up would be able to do it but with the right compresor(turbo i guess till a larger blower comes out) then 600rwhp is prety easy.
i honestly think if you are starting from scratch and you are going to want over 500rwhp in one of these trucks then a radix is not the best route to go. if you will be ok with around 500rwhp or less i think the radix may be the best way to go especialy for keeping it simple, clean and reliable.
#45
Originally Posted by Crash Dummy
Parish isnt kind of funny that it takes twice the torque 1000 VS 500, twice the boost 16 vs 8, more engine 408 and a 100 shot of nitrous to knock 1 second off your time compaired to a radix powered 6.0. These trucks are like lead weights it takes so much more power just to make it a second faster, I think we need to put or engines in Vegas or chevettes I am sure we would have 8 second machines.
there sure are a lot of 11sec trucks out there now only a matter of time before there are a pile of 10sec trucks.
#46
The 3.3L manifold-mounted Whipple from those Aussies at Starr Performance is rated at 1000+HP. If the the 650HP 2.2L version is $10K(US), however, I'd hate the hear what the 3.3L version goes for...
#47
Originally Posted by parish8
limits? what are you talking about? everyone knows you can just spin a blower as fast as you want and get in infinate amount of power
just foolin around i just dont want to misslead people. if someone wants 600rwhp maybe a radix in a perfect world on a perfect set up would be able to do it but with the right compresor(turbo i guess till a larger blower comes out) then 600rwhp is prety easy.
i honestly think if you are starting from scratch and you are going to want over 500rwhp in one of these trucks then a radix is not the best route to go. if you will be ok with around 500rwhp or less i think the radix may be the best way to go especialy for keeping it simple, clean and reliable.
just foolin around i just dont want to misslead people. if someone wants 600rwhp maybe a radix in a perfect world on a perfect set up would be able to do it but with the right compresor(turbo i guess till a larger blower comes out) then 600rwhp is prety easy.
i honestly think if you are starting from scratch and you are going to want over 500rwhp in one of these trucks then a radix is not the best route to go. if you will be ok with around 500rwhp or less i think the radix may be the best way to go especialy for keeping it simple, clean and reliable.
#50
Originally Posted by Crash Dummy
Parish I think we all should have 10 second trucks and you should have a 9 second truck then we would all be tickled to death