Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Anyone running a FAST intake on a DBW application???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-20-2009, 10:19 PM
  #11  
Banned Scammer
iTrader: (2)
 
scotthughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i really really want the 102mm. when dose it come out for trucks? i was about to by the 96mm from vengence racing. which is the 92mm from fast but ported
Old 10-21-2009, 08:27 AM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 1,000
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by scotthughes
i really really want the 102mm. when dose it come out for trucks? i was about to by the 96mm from vengence racing. which is the 92mm from fast but ported
I really don't know how this applies to my question?
Old 10-21-2009, 08:29 AM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 1,000
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I really wish FAST was able to make a DBW 92mm TB. Everything will be going to DBW eventually.
Old 10-21-2009, 03:15 PM
  #14  
Banned Scammer
iTrader: (2)
 
scotthughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SweetS10V8
EXACTLY!!!! I wish everyone understood this!!!!

Boost is a measure of restriction, not airflow!!

Get rid of a restriction, aka crappy intake, and you pick up airflow. Airflow is how you gain power. This means with a less restrictive intake you get more power with LESS boost!!! Which is easier on parts!

Then if you want you can turn the boost back up, and gain even more power!

I have a FAST LSXR on a DBW application.




The truck version LSXRT is going to be out soon too
it applys more to his post actually then to your question. sorry.
Old 10-21-2009, 09:56 PM
  #15  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
SweetS10V8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Silvy6.0
So what I'm getting is FAST for N/A and LS6 for boost.
I dont think thats correct at all, airflow is airflow no matter if your forced induction or N/A.

The saying "no replacement for displacement" is becuase more displacement moves more air which equals more power.

Ive also heard the saying "no replacement for displacement, or boost" which boost artificially adds more air which equals more power just like displacement does.

You want more airflow to make more power!!
Old 02-20-2010, 04:45 PM
  #16  
DrX
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
DrX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,702
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

You can put a NW 102mm DBW TB on these.
Attached Thumbnails Anyone running a FAST intake on a DBW application???-102mm-tb-ifast-lsxr.jpg   Anyone running a FAST intake on a DBW application???-fast-lsxrt.jpg  
Old 02-21-2010, 04:23 PM
  #17  
Staging Lane
 
4.6 eatin gm's's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: cali 707
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

so when is the truck 102 intake projected to come out? and cany anyone post a link to there website?
Old 02-21-2010, 05:04 PM
  #18  
DrX
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
DrX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,702
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 4.6 eatin gm's
so when is the truck 102 intake projected to come out? and cany anyone post a link to there website?
www.fuelairspark dot com
Old 02-21-2010, 05:54 PM
  #19  
I AM A MOTHERF*CKER
iTrader: (1)
 
TurboBerserker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,132
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by CI DENALI
If you're going the forced induction route, I would go with either the carb style Victor Jr with an elbow or the new Edelbrock Pro-Flo XT. Either one that can fit a 4-bolt 87-90mm throttle body can work with a DBW Throttle body, but you will have to change fuel rails etc. to fit, so it could get expense. The FAST (and factory) manifolds are designed for maximum cylinder fillings over a range of rpms/throttle positions on a naturally aspirated motor, so they make the runners longer to boost velocity, whereas forced induction takes care of that with boost.
However, on a N/A motor, the carb style/elbow or Pro-Flo XT manifolds, will give up a ton of midrange torque and HP to the factory or FAST, so if it's N/A, the FAST is the way to go.
Of course, if you're going to a Radix TVS (or other roots style) setup, they conveniently take care of the manifold at the same time.
That's my 2 cents anyhow...
I disagree. Both the Vic Jr and the Pro-Flo are going to be pretty equal in a boosted application (and no doubt they will be better for boost than NA), but the FAST will out perform both of them.
Old 03-07-2010, 12:01 AM
  #20  
Staging Lane
 
4.6 eatin gm's's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: cali 707
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

do u need to run special fuel rails to run this intake? if so which ones?


Quick Reply: Anyone running a FAST intake on a DBW application???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:32 PM.