bluecajun5.3?
#42
Lance, have you thought about going with a little larger cam? Your TC is good for a larger one and that intake certainly will work.
I'm guessing your E.T. wasn't all that great??? Did you shortbelt it? Were you at your race weight? What do you plan on doing for your trans issues?
I'm guessing your E.T. wasn't all that great??? Did you shortbelt it? Were you at your race weight? What do you plan on doing for your trans issues?
#43
Thread Starter
17,16,15,14,13,12,11 Drvr
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,713
Likes: 0
From: Mont Belvieu, Texas
Originally Posted by Sport Side
Find it funny that Kano, 02Reaper, and now you have all cut better 60's with the LS6 intake. (I know your converter changed also).
Not taking anything away from lance(bluecajun5.3) But the thats alot of mods to go with the intake(ls6) I'm sure the intake helps with the larger motors, just not sure about the 5.3.
Nice 60' and mph though.
#44
Originally Posted by Z06 DREAMING
Lance, have you thought about going with a little larger cam? Your TC is good for a larger one and that intake certainly will work.
I'm guessing your E.T. wasn't all that great??? Did you shortbelt it? Were you at your race weight? What do you plan on doing for your trans issues?
I'm guessing your E.T. wasn't all that great??? Did you shortbelt it? Were you at your race weight? What do you plan on doing for your trans issues?
#45
Originally Posted by bluecajun5.3
my best e/t was 12.60 with the tranny slipping and struggling to shift.
#46
Originally Posted by v8
Well he did add alot of mods to go with the intake, 3600 stall converter,asp underdrive pulley,larger injectors
Not taking anything away from lance(bluecajun5.3) But the thats alot of mods to go with the intake(ls6) I'm sure the intake helps with the larger motors, just not sure about the 5.3.
Nice 60' and mph though.
Not taking anything away from lance(bluecajun5.3) But the thats alot of mods to go with the intake(ls6) I'm sure the intake helps with the larger motors, just not sure about the 5.3.
Nice 60' and mph though.
the u/d pulley really won't help b/c before i was running shortbelt turning only the w/p. it probably helps on the street though.
the injectors were to keep my IDC happy and worked out for a much cleaner setup.
that's just the way i see it.
#47
I doubt the injectors helped much. Don't think he gained **** from the pulley. The converter possibly did help, but at the same time, his old converter drove around and had shift extensions like a 3500 TCI.... hard to say
If the 60' decreases, then you have gained something. The size of the motor really does not matter at this point. 02Reaper was still using the 5.3L when his 60' decreased and MPH increased. I have A-B comparisons of his on my other computer.
If the 60' decreases, then you have gained something. The size of the motor really does not matter at this point. 02Reaper was still using the 5.3L when his 60' decreased and MPH increased. I have A-B comparisons of his on my other computer.
#48
Thread Starter
17,16,15,14,13,12,11 Drvr
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,713
Likes: 0
From: Mont Belvieu, Texas
Originally Posted by bluecajun5.3
considering my previous converter had the same shift extension as this one, i won't be accouting for that.
the u/d pulley really won't help b/c before i was running shortbelt turning only the w/p. it probably helps on the street though.
the injectors were to keep my IDC happy and worked out for a much cleaner setup.
that's just the way i see it.
the u/d pulley really won't help b/c before i was running shortbelt turning only the w/p. it probably helps on the street though.
the injectors were to keep my IDC happy and worked out for a much cleaner setup.
that's just the way i see it.
Good luck on the progress, its a pain in the *** to do all the work and not come out faster in the end. Been there done that lol.
#50
Originally Posted by bluecajun5.3
i'm not giving up my hopes on this combination.
thanks, thats a good thing
Id like to see all the kinks worked out and you get low 12s
reguardless
I think additional runs are necessary before we make any assumptions "good or bad" with this particular setup