D_reks{5.3}

iTrader: (13)

thanx everyone for all your opinions. they helped

D_reks{5.3}

iTrader: (13)

what do you guys think i should run out of these 3 cams..i dont want something thats gonna hurt me if i dont put a converter in..or something that doesnt completely ruin my mpgs even worse

http://speed-eng.com/store/product_i...oducts_id=1933

http://speed-eng.com/store/product_i...oducts_id=1934

http://speed-eng.com/store/product_i...oducts_id=1935

xlcooplx

iTrader: (26)

run the 212/218

Parke10

iTrader: (5)

so yers just isnt big enough for yer liking?

D_reks{5.3}

iTrader: (13)

thats the same one i was looking at..not to aggressive but still aggressive enough..

Parke10

iTrader: (5)

i think ima be lookin into the 216/220-.525/.532 myabe the 220/224-.530/.534 but prob the 216

sbw9056

iTrader: (9)

I like it. It has good low end torque on a stock converter and pulls hard all the way to my shift point at 6000 rpm. It would probably pull well beyond that.
I want something a little bigger beacause I am getting a higher stall converter and I would like a little more lope.

D reks(5.3) stated, "what do you guys think i should run out of these 3 cams..i dont want something thats gonna hurt me if i dont put a converter in..or something that doesnt completely ruin my mpgs even worse"

I recommend the 216/220-.525/.532. Its the one I am thinking of changing to.

budhayes3

iTrader: (19)

My cam has similar specs to the first one listed...it's a great daily driver and a definite improvement over stock, but nothing crazy be any means. Works great with the stock stall. I'm happy with it, but if I went bigger I'd get a higher stalled converter, but that's just me.

D_reks{5.3}

iTrader: (13)

so if i went with the 216/220 would it be a waste if i didnt get a convertor? i will eventually but not for a little while

D_reks{5.3}

iTrader: (13)

Bumb...