Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Cam debate

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-16-2007, 03:41 PM
  #1  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (45)
 
ChevyThunder17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Michigan, the land of cold
Posts: 959
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Cam debate

Okay, so I'm pulling apart the top end of the 6.0 I swapped into my truck for different gaskets.

The current cam is a 233/237 .579/.568 on a 110 LSA. I have a 222/224 .581/.581 on a 112 I believe. It would take under an hour to swap the cam out.

Thoughts? Swap it or go with what I've already got in there? I think I will be going turbo or blower at some point.

Just looking for some thoughts other than my own.
Old 06-16-2007, 03:45 PM
  #2  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
Moddoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Forest Lake, MN
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

What do you do with the truck?
Old 06-16-2007, 03:50 PM
  #3  
On The Tree
 
mds2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bakersfield, CA
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Is this for your avalanche? Do you have an higher stall torque converter?

I would still opt for the smaller cam in your avalanche.
Old 06-16-2007, 10:04 PM
  #4  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (45)
 
ChevyThunder17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Michigan, the land of cold
Posts: 959
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

This is indeed for my Avalanche. There is currently not a converter in it. I don't see going with anything higher than a 3000 RPM stall.

I drive it around town, I seriously doubt I'll really race it as I don't want it to break anymore than it has to.
Old 06-17-2007, 12:23 AM
  #5  
On The Tree
 
mds2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bakersfield, CA
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If this in an in town vehicle and not your racer, don't bother with the bigger cam. The smaller one would give you a lot more lower end too.
Old 06-17-2007, 05:04 AM
  #6  
? ? ? ? ? ?
iTrader: (16)
 
BigTex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: East of Dallas
Posts: 7,126
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Definitely the 224 cam IMO. That has proven to be a solid cam that can be tame enough to drive daily and won't kill off too much 'real low end' torque (below 2500 where you'll spend most of your daily drive time). That will be easier to tune and have a better idle and should play nicely with a smaller converter.
Old 06-17-2007, 07:35 AM
  #7  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (45)
 
ChevyThunder17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Michigan, the land of cold
Posts: 959
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I believe that I'll be changing out the cam next week. I would like something that's easier to work with, and the more I think about it the more I'd agree that the 224 would be the better way to go, especially given the friendlier LSA.
Old 06-21-2007, 08:45 AM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
OnyxSilveradoSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Detroit
Posts: 1,069
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

motown muscle baby!
I am the guy on there with the 224 in a 6.0L and a 2600 Daco stall, my tuning has finished learning so it is running shoot me a message and we should meet up to compare cams before you swap it out.
I need some track times to see if it lowered my time.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jaypowe11520
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
10
07-29-2015 07:59 PM
Cowboy Tom
GM Drivetrain & Suspension
11
07-21-2015 10:29 PM
projectnightcrawler
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
5
07-19-2015 11:30 PM
lxcoupe
FORCED INDUCTION
5
07-10-2015 05:11 PM
Cowboy17
FORCED INDUCTION
6
07-09-2015 08:22 PM



Quick Reply: Cam debate



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:45 AM.