Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Cam swap parts, a few questions..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-25-2012, 10:59 PM
  #11  
Custm2500's Rude Friend
iTrader: (17)
 
1FastBrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: JunkYard
Posts: 14,383
Received 786 Likes on 652 Posts
Default

How do you plan to obtain 10.1 compression on a stock 5.3L and 243 heads???
Old 01-25-2012, 11:26 PM
  #12  
Custm2500's Rude Friend
iTrader: (17)
 
1FastBrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: JunkYard
Posts: 14,383
Received 786 Likes on 652 Posts
Default

Since a factory 5.3L is around 9.5:1 with the factory heads @ 61.5 CC chamber and the 243 heads have around a 64.5 cc chamber, You would have to mill the 243's around .030 just to get them back to factory spec to maintain 9.5:1.

The more you mill the heads, the more you comprimise the deck for forced inductions applications.

.030 is about the most you can mill a factory head before you start running into Intake fitment issues...

Now if you open the motor up and stick a flat top 4.8L piston in there You would barely have to mill the heads.

Dont believe me??? Look up the factory L33 option. Its an aluminum 5.3L with 4.8 flat top pistons and 243 heads from the factory. Compression is around 9.9:1

HTH
Old 01-26-2012, 10:54 AM
  #13  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
01silvy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 665
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1FastBrick
Since a factory 5.3L is around 9.5:1 with the factory heads @ 61.5 CC chamber and the 243 heads have around a 64.5 cc chamber, You would have to mill the 243's around .030 just to get them back to factory spec to maintain 9.5:1.

The more you mill the heads, the more you comprimise the deck for forced inductions applications.

.030 is about the most you can mill a factory head before you start running into Intake fitment issues...

Now if you open the motor up and stick a flat top 4.8L piston in there You would barely have to mill the heads.

Dont believe me??? Look up the factory L33 option. Its an aluminum 5.3L with 4.8 flat top pistons and 243 heads from the factory. Compression is around 9.9:1

HTH
This is info i've needing to hear.. The main reason im doing the heads is because i'm leaking coolant in the block somehow, either by head gasket or a cracked castec(i do have castecs on this engine) so i was wanting to get rid of these stock heads all together. I wont be swapping pistons or anything like that, I was also planning on using the stock MLS gaskets but if i need to run the thinner cometic head gasket and mill the heads .030"-.035" then i would do that.. So to acheive 10:1 and run the stock MLS head gasket i would probly have to mill the 243's around .040"?

Thanks guys
Old 01-27-2012, 03:56 PM
  #14  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
01silvy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 665
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Bump, any other ideas?
Old 01-30-2012, 03:22 PM
  #15  
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
spent21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Nashville, Tn
Posts: 199
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Some of the 4.8/5.3 heads had a notch in them that hindered one from using MLS gaskets. I'm not sure if any of the 243's were notched or not, but that is definitely something to be mindful of.

Do you already have the 243's? If not, how much are you planning on spending on a set? The reason I ask is that by the time you find a set and have them rebuilt/milled, you may be able to pick up a good set of 862/706's and have a mild port job done.
Old 01-30-2012, 03:45 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
TXSZ66AVLANCHE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,920
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 01silvy
I wont be swapping pistons or anything like that Thanks guys
$27 per piston for new flat tops to much for some added HP?
Old 01-30-2012, 04:12 PM
  #17  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
01silvy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 665
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TXSZ66AVLANCHE
$27 per piston for new flat tops to much for some added HP?
No its not too much at all but all im planning on doing is the heads and cam..doing a head and cam swap is one thing but pulling the entire bottom end and all that is another thing.. if i was gonna do the pistons and all that i would probly just go ahead and do my 6.0 swap.. I've thought about it more and my best bet is to probly just stick with 5.3 heads cause i wont have to mill them hardly at all to get my desired compression ratio..

Since ill probly just stick with 5.3 heads my main concern is i want alittle better flow but will a port job hurt the bottom end power any? I know bringing the compression up will help bottom end too i just dont want to lose any from porting the heads..

Thanks guys
Old 01-30-2012, 04:36 PM
  #18  
Custm2500's Rude Friend
iTrader: (17)
 
1FastBrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: JunkYard
Posts: 14,383
Received 786 Likes on 652 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spent21
Some of the 4.8/5.3 heads had a notch in them that hindered one from using MLS gaskets. I'm not sure if any of the 243's were notched or not, but that is definitely something to be mindful of.

Do you already have the 243's? If not, how much are you planning on spending on a set? The reason I ask is that by the time you find a set and have them rebuilt/milled, you may be able to pick up a good set of 862/706's and have a mild port job done.
I am only aware of it being the early 862 heads on the 99 and some 2000 4.8L/5.3L

The 806 early premeter valve covers had the same issue with the nothced area

Here is were That info can be found. Gen III GM Small Block: Engine Builder

243 heads did not have that issue.

Here is a discusion we had pertaining to MLS head gaskets. https://www.performancetrucks.net/fo...gasket-491846/
Old 01-30-2012, 04:46 PM
  #19  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
01silvy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 665
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

^^^^^^ yeah thats what i was thinking, i dont think the notched heads will be a problem for me.
Old 01-30-2012, 04:56 PM
  #20  
Custm2500's Rude Friend
iTrader: (17)
 
1FastBrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: JunkYard
Posts: 14,383
Received 786 Likes on 652 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 01silvy
No its not too much at all but all im planning on doing is the heads and cam..doing a head and cam swap is one thing but pulling the entire bottom end and all that is another thing.. if i was gonna do the pistons and all that i would probly just go ahead and do my 6.0 swap.. I've thought about it more and my best bet is to probly just stick with 5.3 heads cause i wont have to mill them hardly at all to get my desired compression ratio..

Since ill probly just stick with 5.3 heads my main concern is i want alittle better flow but will a port job hurt the bottom end power any? I know bringing the compression up will help bottom end too i just dont want to lose any from porting the heads..

Thanks guys
No A mild port job would not hurt your bottom end power band.


Quick Reply: Cam swap parts, a few questions..



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:58 PM.