Cam thread
#21
I could not be happier with my 210/218 .530/.530 112 right now.
It's all torque, at any amount of pedal, at any RPM... even on a stock 'verter and manifolds.
I had that 'small drag cam' in before... the TR220. It was nice, just not my bag of chips. I'll never look at another drag oriented cam for a long, long time.
It's all torque, at any amount of pedal, at any RPM... even on a stock 'verter and manifolds.
I had that 'small drag cam' in before... the TR220. It was nice, just not my bag of chips. I'll never look at another drag oriented cam for a long, long time.
#23
Aaron, That's a real good question...
I was pretty well conviced before that spec wise, that the 220 was going to work well for me. Not much was going to change my mind. After I got it in, what Joe Vinci said in this post really hit home with me.
I think headers would have helped by adding more power all over... and the converter would have helped with getting off the line - but the cam still didn't really come alive until I had 4K on the tach. I think this one is much better for that streetlight to streetlight stuff that Joe mentioned. It's 'alive' at all rpm's...
What I disliked - it just felt like I had to beat on the truck to get power out of the motor. The motor liked a heavy foot -- kick it down everywhere, and you'll be rewarded. Try to just take it easy, and you were disappointed.
Power on the highway (2000-2200 rpm) was slighty worse than stock. I towed with it, and it wasn't BAD, but it wasn't great. Slower on the lowened, but pulling well up above 3,500.
I had a lot of valvetrain noise too. I felt like it subtracted from the valve of the vehicle.
I was pretty well conviced before that spec wise, that the 220 was going to work well for me. Not much was going to change my mind. After I got it in, what Joe Vinci said in this post really hit home with me.
I think headers would have helped by adding more power all over... and the converter would have helped with getting off the line - but the cam still didn't really come alive until I had 4K on the tach. I think this one is much better for that streetlight to streetlight stuff that Joe mentioned. It's 'alive' at all rpm's...
What I disliked - it just felt like I had to beat on the truck to get power out of the motor. The motor liked a heavy foot -- kick it down everywhere, and you'll be rewarded. Try to just take it easy, and you were disappointed.
Power on the highway (2000-2200 rpm) was slighty worse than stock. I towed with it, and it wasn't BAD, but it wasn't great. Slower on the lowened, but pulling well up above 3,500.
I had a lot of valvetrain noise too. I felt like it subtracted from the valve of the vehicle.
#24
My cam was a custom grind from comp cams......I will have to say that it was not the best cam without a tune and a stall, I installed it before I got a stall and a tune and was running a 15.3 et. I now run a 14.70 with my stall and tune, but I can't use my stall cause I get no traction I am also a peg leg. Brent at TEA watched me run and said if I got traction I could get low 14's. I have a 2.3 60' at best right now.
#25
Originally Posted by hink9
you can run a big cam with a blower/turbo, some guys are running 236 cams with turbos, i dont know what your definition of big is, some guys are running tr224s, which isnt that big to me, its all in what you want, if you dont mind having to wind your motor up to 3500 before you start making good power then you need a t-rex or soemthing like that. if i had lots of money i would spec the cam very last after i already had a built motor and everything was the way i wanted it,
#26
TECH Enthusiast
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
From: C.S. TX
Originally Posted by marc_w
Aaron, That's a real good question...
I was pretty well conviced before that spec wise, that the 220 was going to work well for me. Not much was going to change my mind. After I got it in, what Joe Vinci said in this post really hit home with me.
I think headers would have helped by adding more power all over... and the converter would have helped with getting off the line - but the cam still didn't really come alive until I had 4K on the tach. I think this one is much better for that streetlight to streetlight stuff that Joe mentioned. It's 'alive' at all rpm's...
What I disliked - it just felt like I had to beat on the truck to get power out of the motor. The motor liked a heavy foot -- kick it down everywhere, and you'll be rewarded. Try to just take it easy, and you were disappointed.
Power on the highway (2000-2200 rpm) was slighty worse than stock. I towed with it, and it wasn't BAD, but it wasn't great. Slower on the lowened, but pulling well up above 3,500.
I had a lot of valvetrain noise too. I felt like it subtracted from the valve of the vehicle.
I was pretty well conviced before that spec wise, that the 220 was going to work well for me. Not much was going to change my mind. After I got it in, what Joe Vinci said in this post really hit home with me.
I think headers would have helped by adding more power all over... and the converter would have helped with getting off the line - but the cam still didn't really come alive until I had 4K on the tach. I think this one is much better for that streetlight to streetlight stuff that Joe mentioned. It's 'alive' at all rpm's...
What I disliked - it just felt like I had to beat on the truck to get power out of the motor. The motor liked a heavy foot -- kick it down everywhere, and you'll be rewarded. Try to just take it easy, and you were disappointed.
Power on the highway (2000-2200 rpm) was slighty worse than stock. I towed with it, and it wasn't BAD, but it wasn't great. Slower on the lowened, but pulling well up above 3,500.
I had a lot of valvetrain noise too. I felt like it subtracted from the valve of the vehicle.
Also, was your TR220 on a 112, or 114 LSA?
#27
Originally Posted by Naked AV
Wouldn't you spec the converter last, after you found out where the cam's powerband was?
#29
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
From: Redondo Beach,CA
Originally Posted by 02denali
i like the way my cam is pulling. i have the 2500 stall. 216-220-525-532-114. i put on 1.85 rockers. i figured the lift to be =571.3 and 578.1. not sure how that affects duration. anyone know on the duration????