Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

cams

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-04-2007, 10:34 PM
  #41  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
99Silverado5.3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: (281)-(713)-(832)
Posts: 2,558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1slow01Z71

Im guessing you have a degree wheel to install it on a 106...
110-4=106
Old 09-04-2007, 10:35 PM
  #42  
Tin Foil Hat Wearin' Fool
iTrader: (36)
 
1slow01Z71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 23,204
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rhino79
Well, 110 lsa and it has 4* advance in it, I think it should be 106 just installing it straight up. Wouldn't be a bad idea to check it though.
Just figured with the cam specs getting all technical it would be a good idea to check it.

99silverado-He has a vic jr and full length dual exhaust I think he will be just fine
Old 09-04-2007, 10:38 PM
  #43  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
Rhino79's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cabot, AR
Posts: 3,127
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

And a 4bbl......with a K&N.
Old 09-04-2007, 10:44 PM
  #44  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
99Silverado5.3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: (281)-(713)-(832)
Posts: 2,558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Why would he need to degree it to 106 if it is 110 with 4* advanced Installing it straight up? 110-4=106 correct? You would not have to degree it to 106 since the 4* of advance.

Or am I confused???
Old 09-04-2007, 10:46 PM
  #45  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
Rhino79's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cabot, AR
Posts: 3,127
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Your right, I was just reading from Patrick G's spec sheet. It should be straight up, but its always good to double check that it is actually what it is supposed to be.
Old 09-04-2007, 11:14 PM
  #46  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (24)
 
RandomHero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Austin,TX Name:Mark
Posts: 4,787
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

so can anyone explain this then?
Old 09-05-2007, 05:48 AM
  #47  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (18)
 
tdrumm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Northeast, NJ
Posts: 2,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What do you want to know?
Old 09-05-2007, 05:59 AM
  #48  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
99Silverado5.3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: (281)-(713)-(832)
Posts: 2,558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rhino79
Your right, I was just reading from Patrick G's spec sheet. It should be straight up, but its always good to double check that it is actually what it is supposed to be.
Oh ok, thought you were 100% on what the cam was.

Yes, it would be a good idea to know what the cam is speced at before you put it in lol.

Should be a beast though.

Originally Posted by RandomHero
so can anyone explain this then?
What? How it relates to 243, 317, ect.. heads?
Old 09-05-2007, 08:40 AM
  #49  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (24)
 
RandomHero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Austin,TX Name:Mark
Posts: 4,787
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

that's a graph for a stock 5.3L head. Anybody care to explain scienficially how running a cam with .575 lift would gain more than a couple rwhp than running one with .520 lift?
Old 09-05-2007, 08:53 AM
  #50  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Phantom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The 405
Posts: 5,686
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

i made more power to a higher rpm with my low lift comp 212/218 than i did my 216/224 .551 115lsa vinci cam. my 212/218 is still making power at 6300 where i shift, where the 216/224 started to fall on its face at 5750. mark i don't know if that helps you out any but i thought it was pretty interesting


Quick Reply: cams



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:26 AM.