Carbed 6.0 Intakes?
03-17-2007, 12:52 AM
#11
Okay, it's not that we're anti carb or whatever, it's just it seems to me that (from the information that he has given) it would be more cost effective to just go and buy a damn computer than to try swappin to carb. he said he had everything EXCEPT THE COMPUTER....
So my last question still stands... why not just get an ECU and have it tuned? Seems like he'd make just as much or more power, don't ya think? I never said there was anything wrong with carb, but since it's a gen3 and since he has everything except the ECU apparently, it would just be easier and more cost effective to do it that way. k thx bye.
Originally Posted by '89ChevyMadneSS
im missing computer (and tune obviously) and i just want to get it in and running for now till i can get the rotating assemly for the 408 after school is out in a cpl months. ive got a couple nice carbs that i think will do well with the 6.0 but im not sure how many cfm are optimal.
So my last question still stands... why not just get an ECU and have it tuned? Seems like he'd make just as much or more power, don't ya think? I never said there was anything wrong with carb, but since it's a gen3 and since he has everything except the ECU apparently, it would just be easier and more cost effective to do it that way. k thx bye.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
05GMC4.8
GMT 900 Trucks General Discussion
5
08-07-2015 09:55 PM
