Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

cat delete= slower?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-24-2009, 06:10 PM
  #21  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
ss454327's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I just removed mine and did some data logging runs and I can assure you the engine didn't lose any power. Anyone claiming you need them for backpressure doesn't understand the concept of that term. Having correct "backpresure" means you have 0 resistance while also having constant velocity. I can tell you I did get some KR at the top of my 2-3 shift because of the resonance of the exhaust without the cats. We found it to be false knock so we dialed the sensativity back a bit and didn't get it again.

Most people claim to have lost power down low because it sounds louder at lower RPMs so when it sounds like it's winding out most people remember it going faster when it was that loud.

Last edited by ss454327; 02-24-2009 at 06:20 PM.
Old 02-24-2009, 10:21 PM
  #22  
Registered User
 
JYount's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: MO
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ss454327
I just removed mine and did some data logging runs and I can assure you the engine didn't lose any power. Anyone claiming you need them for backpressure doesn't understand the concept of that term. Having correct "backpresure" means you have 0 resistance while also having constant velocity. I can tell you I did get some KR at the top of my 2-3 shift because of the resonance of the exhaust without the cats. We found it to be false knock so we dialed the sensativity back a bit and didn't get it again.

Most people claim to have lost power down low because it sounds louder at lower RPMs so when it sounds like it's winding out most people remember it going faster when it was that loud.

Like he said, backpressure is a misnomer, everyone says bp but the only effect of exhaust being free flowing is less scavenging, cause theoretically the velocity of the exhaust should increase. Unless you put a pipe through it though, gutting alone can hurt flow. This is why
Exhaust in cat, expands to fill area that used to be glowing hot honeycomb, then has to shrink back down to go out the exit. It has been verified with water flow rating, gutted cats flow worse than cats with the junk in em, straight through pipes are obviously the best.
Old 02-24-2009, 10:42 PM
  #23  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
ss454327's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So this guy gutted his cats instead of cutting them out and putting in pipe? That I can believe would cause a loss in power because of the added turbulance.
Old 02-24-2009, 11:23 PM
  #24  
Registered User
 
JYount's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: MO
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ss454327
So this guy gutted his cats instead of cutting them out and putting in pipe? That I can believe would cause a loss in power because of the added turbulance.
doesn't read that way, now that i go back. its been a couple days since the thread started
Old 02-25-2009, 09:31 AM
  #25  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
jeforton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: end of the earth: 12 miles, lander wy:20
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

no, i cut the cats off and welded in some pipe. would a small exhaust leak cause the loss in power? when i went to the drive through, i could hear and exhaust leak echoing off the wall. i can't be very big, but would that screw with anything?

p.s.
sorry for the stupid questions, i always figured after the headers(or exhaust manifolds) it was all about sound. so be patient while i figure out the ins and outs of exhaust tuning.
Old 02-25-2009, 04:22 PM
  #26  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
ss454327's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jeforton
no, i cut the cats off and welded in some pipe. would a small exhaust leak cause the loss in power? when i went to the drive through, i could hear and exhaust leak echoing off the wall. i can't be very big, but would that screw with anything?

p.s.
sorry for the stupid questions, i always figured after the headers(or exhaust manifolds) it was all about sound. so be patient while i figure out the ins and outs of exhaust tuning.


A leak could cause a slight loss in power but it's more likely resonance causing false knock or the simple fact that it sounds louder at lower RPMs so you feel it should be accelerating faster than it is.
Old 02-25-2009, 08:08 PM
  #27  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
jeforton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: end of the earth: 12 miles, lander wy:20
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

it's not that it feels slower, it is slower. my 0-60mph time was 9.78 with the cats. 10.2 with out the cats.
Old 09-03-2009, 12:14 PM
  #28  
TECH Fanatic
 
camochevy21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: St. Louis Area
Posts: 1,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I went from a Y pipe to true duals with no mufflers and stock cats and my truck was slower off the line but had more at top end. I think if I still had that exhaust a tune would have made it better all around. I think it sounds like a tune is what you need then go from there. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
madmann26
FORCED INDUCTION
10
04-29-2020 09:17 AM
Chewy07
New Members
1
11-14-2015 09:46 PM
BlownHD
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
4
10-03-2015 12:24 PM
Wolftrk99
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
14
10-02-2015 08:17 AM
02AWDAWSDenali
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
2
10-01-2015 05:08 PM



Quick Reply: cat delete= slower?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:33 AM.