Change in plans - no LQ9, keeping stock LQ4 instead
I say go with the LQ9. How much boost are you planning on running with the LQ4 anyway?
04-19-2006, 04:11 PM
#15
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Arizona Bay
Posts: 4,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's a negatory on Friday. I'm working late and I'm convoying up with the boys on Saturday.
As for the bill: A built 80E, new cam, new pulley, and a 6.0L....what's another $700.
Actually, you know what, go with the LQ4 and use the extra money for some better valves and/or do some minor polishing and bowl work.
As for the bill: A built 80E, new cam, new pulley, and a 6.0L....what's another $700.
Actually, you know what, go with the LQ4 and use the extra money for some better valves and/or do some minor polishing and bowl work.
04-23-2006, 04:48 PM
#16
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Orlando
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I kind of wish I went I with the lq4 and just threw on some ls6 heads to up the compression ratio for NA performance, than if I wanted to run boost, just throw on the 317 heads to lower it. Now if I want to lower it, it seems my only options are to get dished pistons because I have heard stacking or getting thicker head gaskets is not a good idea.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ARC
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion
57
02-21-2022 10:54 AM
GrooveCityZ71
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
7
08-31-2015 12:05 PM
Suburban2500
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
31
07-19-2015 04:50 PM
