Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

dyno results, Help.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-05-2004, 08:07 PM
  #1  
paw
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
paw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default dyno results, Help.

Here are my modest dyno results, 233/266. 2002 yukon 5.3. I have a K&N FIPK, Flowmaster cat back and westers tune. Is that normal numbers for those mods? What is the stock HP/torque on these trucks?

dyno shows i'm running rich. Do i need to have wester tune for that? What is optimal AF for my truck?

here's the link.
http://img17.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img17&image=watkins.jpg
http://img3.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img3&image=000_0264.jpg
Old 10-05-2004, 08:56 PM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
 
derek_silvy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'ld call westers and yell him about your rich situation. You are dipping to about 10.8 @ 5K, which isn't too great.

What year is the truck? I'ld think that you should be seeing about 20 more RWHP.... maybe that will be there when you get your a/f ratio straight.
Old 10-05-2004, 09:04 PM
  #3  
Formerly one92rs
iTrader: (1)
 
one03sierra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: league city texas
Posts: 4,205
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Talking

yay man he will have to tune for that.
Old 10-05-2004, 09:21 PM
  #4  
paw
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
paw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Noob question here, I told wester I had high flow cats installed, but i have'nt put them on yet. Would that have anything to do with it running rich?
Old 10-05-2004, 09:36 PM
  #5  
TECH Veteran
 
zippy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

you want around 12.7:1. that is rediculous. that pcm should be back in his hands asap and he should be explaining that one. way too rich.
Old 10-05-2004, 10:01 PM
  #6  
paw
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
paw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I told wester I had high flow cats installed, but i have'nt put them on yet. Would that have anything to do with it running rich?
Old 10-05-2004, 10:12 PM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
 
derek_silvy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If westers knows, then he should have that covered....

But hey, with a 10.8 a/f obviously something isn't covered.
Old 10-06-2004, 07:23 AM
  #8  
paw
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
paw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

does anyone know if high flow cats being tuned into the pcm and not being on the truck yet would cause it to run rich?
Old 10-06-2004, 07:40 AM
  #9  
TECH Enthusiast
 
derek_silvy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

From what I saw on another post, when a higher flowing exhaust system is installed, more air passes over the o2 sensor at a faster rate, and it somehow confuses the PCM.... and Westers may have changed some parameters around. However, I doubt it will effect you that much! I'ld go ahead and get those cats installed.... it can't be more than 60 bucks, and then see how it does.
Old 10-06-2004, 09:18 AM
  #10  
? ? ? ? ? ?
iTrader: (16)
 
BigTex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: East of Dallas
Posts: 7,126
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Couple of thoughts-

I assume you made the pulls in 2nd gear. 2nd gear pulls are lower than 3rd gear pulls.

Those big wheels and tires are robbing some power.

Was this a mustang type dyno? They will show lower numbers than the typical dynojet.

Isn't it interesting that the power is near identical between the two runs, yet there is a very large difference in the air/fuel readings between them. If the readings were accurate, I'd think there would be a power difference between runs. I'm thinking the A/F readings aren't 100% accurate in this case.


Quick Reply: dyno results, Help.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:27 AM.