Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Flow-Junk, Flow Disaster, Etc...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-14-2006, 04:53 PM
  #1  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
DakotaKiller5.3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Temple TX
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Flow-Junk, Flow Disaster, Etc...

just a quickie here... why does everyone knock the **** out of flowmaster? i mean, i honestly didnt know that they were that bad. should i look into changing this? anyone got any good dyno #s, making them look bad?
Old 01-14-2006, 07:11 PM
  #2  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (7)
 
BigBlockChev572's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Because they don't flow. And besides have you seen some of their ridiculous claims? For the Vette they say a gain of 35RWHP! Yeah ok.
Old 01-14-2006, 07:15 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
Onyx 02's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Cause they suck and they're obnoxious! I hate them, cause every person who has a truck has a Flowmaster single in, dual out with big chrome tips. They almost sound exactly the same on GMs, Dodges, Fords, etc.
Old 01-14-2006, 07:41 PM
  #4  
Tin Foil Hat Wearin' Fool
iTrader: (36)
 
1slow01Z71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 23,204
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Im not going to bother searching for charts everyone I mean EVERYONE that has taken them off and put something else on got less resonance and more power. Hell splice a cheapo dynomax racing bullet in and you will see what I mean

I love my racing bullets that I had cheap and effective.
Old 01-14-2006, 08:00 PM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
 
JT-bo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Napoleonville,La.
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Have you ever seen a cut away of a flowmaster muffler, the exhaust goes through a friggin maze trying to get out especially in my 50 series(my mistake, bought exhaust before knowing any better) but that isnt why i hate it, i hate it cause it sounds like **** and it drones like a mother around 75-80 mph.
Old 01-14-2006, 08:32 PM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
 
GMC_DUDE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Western WA
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

More objectively, I believe BlownChevy did some testing at Magnacharger, and found a 12 RWHP gain by switching from Slowmaster to Magnaflow.
Old 01-14-2006, 11:05 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
 
CrabhartLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Firstly, i hate the redneck/ricer mentality synonomous with flowmaster, their outrageous K&N-like power claims, and their bass-ackwards chamber design. it looks like an obstacle course for your exhaust.

Dynos for LS1 f-bodies with the flowmaster catback have shown an average gain of around 5hp, i've seen some that gained 10, i've seen some that lost a few. Quite pathetic for the price it goes at. The sound varies from generic to irratating, and the drone is annoying at best.

The only flowmaster product i would even consider buying is their mandrel bent pipe and maybe the hushpower mufflers, but even they are overpriced.

I could go on, but i won't. As of right now my favorite company is dynomax, i really like their bullets and their ultra flow mufflers are great.

I can't imagine a better cost to sound to flow ratio than the stock muffler replaced with a single bullet exiting to the stock location.
Old 01-14-2006, 11:12 PM
  #8  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
Rhino79's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cabot, AR
Posts: 3,127
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

There is nothing wrong with 13" 40 series 2 chamber Original Flowmasters on a true dual setup. Now on a single in dual out setup, I don't know, and personally would not spend my money on a "performance" exhaust that only utilizes one muffler. I like true duals with no cats and a couple 40 series flows.....different strokes for different folks, or maybe I am just old-fashioned.
Old 01-15-2006, 12:22 AM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
 
CrabhartLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rhino79
.different strokes for different folks, or maybe I am just old-fashioned.

wouldn't old-fashioned mean glasspacks? no offense but IMO fiberglass-packed mufflers with straight-through designs are the most effective muffler designs i've seen.
Old 01-15-2006, 01:57 AM
  #10  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
Rhino79's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cabot, AR
Posts: 3,127
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by CrabhartLS1
wouldn't old-fashioned mean glasspacks? no offense but IMO fiberglass-packed mufflers with straight-through designs are the most effective muffler designs i've seen.
Glasspacks might flow good, but I do not like how they sound as much as the Flowmasters. I have run glasspacks before, anywhere from 12" glasspacks all the was to 22" glasspacks and when I switched to 40 series 2 chambers I could not tell a difference powerwise.


Quick Reply: Flow-Junk, Flow Disaster, Etc...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:38 PM.