GEN III/IV Specs Thread

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

03-03-2010, 09:21 PM

#11

skolman91

TECH Addict

iTrader: (28)

Join Date: Feb 2009

Location: muncie IN

Posts: 2,018

Likes: 12

Received 57 Likes on 35 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1slow01Z71

It has teh 5.3 in there but it references the wrong cubic inches as a 5.3 is 325ci not 327, I dont know why its so hard for everyone to udnerstand the 5.3 is in NO way tied to the old school 327

They might be referring to the monster 327crate engine gm came out with, who knows..

Reply Like

03-03-2010, 09:59 PM

#12

viciousknid

Where's the Beef?

iTrader: (8)

Join Date: Jan 2007

Location: Dover, Oklahoma

Posts: 9,382

Likes: 0

Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Quote:

Originally Posted by skolman91

They might be referring to the monster 327crate engine gm came out with, who knows..

lol. That was still 325ci with 327hp

Reply Like

03-03-2010, 10:32 PM

#13

skolman91

TECH Addict

iTrader: (28)

Join Date: Feb 2009

Location: muncie IN

Posts: 2,018

Likes: 12

Received 57 Likes on 35 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by viciousknid

lol. That was still 325ci with 327hp

not according to their website http://www.gmperformanceparts.com/En...5628&engCat=ls
maybe they thought the extra (2cu in) that are supposedly in it would make it fly off the shelf..

Reply Like

03-03-2010, 11:10 PM

#14

max1

Banned

iTrader: (12)

Join Date: Jun 2009

Posts: 201

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

great find....

Reply Like

03-03-2010, 11:20 PM

#15

1slow01Z71

Tin Foil Hat Wearin' Fool

iTrader: (36)

Join Date: Oct 2004

Location: Austin, TX

Posts: 23,204

Likes: 0

Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by skolman91

not according to their website http://www.gmperformanceparts.com/En...5628&engCat=ls
maybe they thought the extra (2cu in) that are supposedly in it would make it fly off the shelf..

Apparently GM's displacement calculator was broken the day they put that info together