hot chick sway bars
07-16-2004, 03:38 PM
#1
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hot chick sway bars
i need to know if hotchkis sway bars (stock height) would fit on this suspension:
Aftermarket Shocks
2'' rear drop shackles
Cal tracs
anyone see any problems with this?
Aftermarket Shocks
2'' rear drop shackles
Cal tracs
anyone see any problems with this?
07-16-2004, 03:42 PM
#2
TECH Addict
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central, MA
Posts: 2,618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I imagine they would.
The Silverado SS's are the same as Z71's, but without the 2" lift blocks under the springs. The standard 'stock height' hotchkis bars work on the SS's.
The Silverado SS's are the same as Z71's, but without the 2" lift blocks under the springs. The standard 'stock height' hotchkis bars work on the SS's.
07-16-2004, 05:54 PM
#3
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Cal Tracks may be in the way. I just recently put Cal Track bars on a 92' Truck. We had the Hotchkis pan hard bar on it would not bolt back on. The Cal Track are sure cool though!!!
07-16-2004, 09:06 PM
#4
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 1,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From what I have found is The only differance in sway bar applications is the length of the end links. A 4wd sway bar is the same for a 2wd. The end links are going to be differant lengths.
Cal trac bars will not interfere with the Hotchkis sway bar.
Hotchkis hasn't developed a pan hard bar for the 99 nbs trucks because I don't believe they need one like the old body styles did. the old style having the Thicker frame, differant shock layout etc..
Cal trac bars will not interfere with the Hotchkis sway bar.
Hotchkis hasn't developed a pan hard bar for the 99 nbs trucks because I don't believe they need one like the old body styles did. the old style having the Thicker frame, differant shock layout etc..
07-17-2004, 12:14 AM
#6
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Armpit of East TX
Posts: 9,342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm with creedarado.. they shouldn't interfere at all. They didn't on mine.
As for the sway bars .. new end links will fix any problems that might be and they should be fairly cheap.
As for the sway bars .. new end links will fix any problems that might be and they should be fairly cheap.
07-18-2004, 03:51 AM
#7
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: fresno, ca
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by creederado
From what I have found is The only differance in sway bar applications is the length of the end links. A 4wd sway bar is the same for a 2wd. The end links are going to be differant lengths.
Cal trac bars will not interfere with the Hotchkis sway bar.
Hotchkis hasn't developed a pan hard bar for the 99 nbs trucks because I don't believe they need one like the old body styles did. the old style having the Thicker frame, differant shock layout etc..
Cal trac bars will not interfere with the Hotchkis sway bar.
Hotchkis hasn't developed a pan hard bar for the 99 nbs trucks because I don't believe they need one like the old body styles did. the old style having the Thicker frame, differant shock layout etc..
are there any more pics of that link setup
Trending Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
carid
Sponsor's Announcements, Sales, and Specials
0
10-01-2015 09:22 AM
Wrecker 426
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
1
09-30-2015 09:39 PM
