Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

HP with a LQ4&9

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-22-2008, 03:28 PM
  #11  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
GMCtrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 12,275
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fireman31
didn't know that the LQ4 was 9.4:1......excuse me for being .08 off on the LQ9
No harm intended my friend.
Old 12-22-2008, 05:26 PM
  #12  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
ALL85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: pa
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thanks for the info
Old 12-22-2008, 06:09 PM
  #13  
13 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (17)
 
726.0chevelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: baton rouge
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

first off there were two different lq4 horsepower ratings the first couple of years they came with cast iron heads they were rated at 300 give or take a few then they came with the aluminum 317's which were rated from 320 to 325 depends on where you look the lq9's on most sites say 340 to 345 now that is rated horsepower not with custom tunes i have an ls1 book that dynos an lq4 with full factory exhaust and factory airbox i think a factory tune made 337 flywheel
Old 12-22-2008, 06:18 PM
  #14  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
GMCtrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 12,275
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 726.0chevelle
first off there were two different lq4 horsepower ratings the first couple of years they came with cast iron heads they were rated at 300 give or take a few then they came with the aluminum 317's which were rated from 320 to 325 depends on where you look the lq9's on most sites say 340 to 345 now that is rated horsepower not with custom tunes i have an ls1 book that dynos an lq4 with full factory exhaust and factory airbox i think a factory tune made 337 flywheel
Don't quote me on this, but the 99-00 shared the same camshaft as the 4.8 and 5.3 which was a 190/191. I know for a fact that the LQ9 uses a 196/207 cam and has orange LS6 style springs. I would bet that the 01+ LQ4 also uses the 196/207 cam.
Old 12-22-2008, 06:22 PM
  #15  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
GMCtrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 12,275
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Here it is:

'99-'00 - 191/190 .457/.466 114lsa
'01-'06 - 196/207 .467/.479 116lsa


Also, the only reason some LQ4s were rated @ 300 HP was because it was only rated at 4400 rpm. On my stock LQ9 dyno, power peaked at 5200, and there was a 20rwhp gain from 4400rpm to 5200 rpm. So that right there is the majority of the rated difference between the LQ4 and LQ9, which is negligible.
Old 12-22-2008, 07:33 PM
  #16  
TECH Resident
 
nighthawk08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 881
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

even a 05 LQ4 was rated at 300 in a 1500HD. it just depended on the application.
Old 12-23-2008, 02:54 AM
  #17  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
ALL85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: pa
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

so is the only diff. the cam and if I plan on changing the cam it doesn't matter LQ4 or 9
Old 12-23-2008, 03:23 AM
  #18  
On The Tree
iTrader: (9)
 
vff_jeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Liberty Hill, TX
Posts: 181
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

All Factory, and flywheel ratings aside. Anyone dyno a stock Lq4 and a Stock Lq9 TO THE WHEELS?
Old 12-23-2008, 07:36 AM
  #19  
TECH Resident
 
nighthawk08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 881
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by ALL85
so is the only diff. the cam and if I plan on changing the cam it doesn't matter LQ4 or 9
and the compression ratio!
Old 12-23-2008, 12:56 PM
  #20  
On The Tree
 
Fireman31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 03sierraslt
I dont think he ment any harm by correcting you, rather just trying to clear things up.
Originally Posted by GMCtrk
No harm intended my friend.
Sorry guys, I was arguing with my boss on the phone when I replied, yesterday was a bad day at the office!









All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:33 AM.