HPTuner arrived. Question
#22
what a rush!
iTrader: (8)
Originally Posted by Flyer
Here's a screenshot from my tune file with no TQM. This should give you an idea of what tables to edit out the TQM.
http://www.woracing.com/truck/screen...screenshot.jpg
http://www.woracing.com/truck/screen...screenshot.jpg
#25
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Armpit of East TX
Posts: 9,342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here's to half.
http://www.woracing.com/truck/screen...screenshot.jpg
Notice the only ones changed here are the 'Retard vs. % torque reduction' and the 'Torque Reduction vs torque vs shift'. The 2nd table mentioned was only adjusted some to even out what felt like twice the amount of TQM in the 1-2 shift vs what it felt like on the 2-3 shift.
Give me a little bit and I'll get another one from the stock file.
http://www.woracing.com/truck/screen...screenshot.jpg
Notice the only ones changed here are the 'Retard vs. % torque reduction' and the 'Torque Reduction vs torque vs shift'. The 2nd table mentioned was only adjusted some to even out what felt like twice the amount of TQM in the 1-2 shift vs what it felt like on the 2-3 shift.
Give me a little bit and I'll get another one from the stock file.
#26
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Armpit of East TX
Posts: 9,342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Okay ... Here they are in one post.
All TQM:
http://www.woracing.com/truck/screen...screenshot.jpg
Half:
http://www.woracing.com/truck/screen...screenshot.jpg
TQM removed Completely:
http://www.woracing.com/truck/screen...screenshot.jpg
It might be worth mentioning, theoretically, to remove all of it, only the 'Retard vs. % Torque Reduction' table 'needs' to be 0'd completely as well as the abuse modes disabled. The others are parameters pointing and directing how much and where of the Retard vs % Torque Reduction table should be used. Just to be safe and thorough, I 0'd all the tables mentioning TQM though.
All TQM:
http://www.woracing.com/truck/screen...screenshot.jpg
Half:
http://www.woracing.com/truck/screen...screenshot.jpg
TQM removed Completely:
http://www.woracing.com/truck/screen...screenshot.jpg
It might be worth mentioning, theoretically, to remove all of it, only the 'Retard vs. % Torque Reduction' table 'needs' to be 0'd completely as well as the abuse modes disabled. The others are parameters pointing and directing how much and where of the Retard vs % Torque Reduction table should be used. Just to be safe and thorough, I 0'd all the tables mentioning TQM though.
#28
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 2,784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
just for arguements sake, how much time can you expect to drop going from 100% TQM to 0% ? I currently have 100% so that I can get the rest of my setup together while Im deciding on a tranny.
#29
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Armpit of East TX
Posts: 9,342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hard to say ... It will be a significant difference though, well, maybe not significant, but definantly noticable. The TQM creates a HUGE lose in momentum during the shifts.
#30
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Armpit of East TX
Posts: 9,342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
grippy, the 'Retard vs % Torque Reduction' table defines how much timing is pulled for the percentage of requested torque reduction.
*In Theory* ... if the PCM requests 100% torque reduction (during a shift), it's going to look at that table and see that it should pull 47* of timing based on the stock tables, or 24* of timing based on the table cut in half screenshot.
*In Theory* ... if the PCM requests 100% torque reduction (during a shift), it's going to look at that table and see that it should pull 47* of timing based on the stock tables, or 24* of timing based on the table cut in half screenshot.