Mr.Nobody

iTrader: (1)

ok i want something straightened out, my buddy is trying to tell me he saw a dyno between pace and lpp and there was a 20 hp diff favoring pace because of the collector design so idk ..

gs7793

iTrader: (8)

sounds like your buddys just tryin to sound smart to me...lol...

dirt track racer 81

iTrader: (45)

yep.. then the lpps only make 5 or so over the manifolds..hes jealous of your prettier lpp headers over his pacesetters is what it sounds like.

Mr.Nobody

iTrader: (1)

yea thats what i was thinkin he said some truck on the dyno with a tr220 made 310 with lpps then he got pace and made 330 i just laughed and said whatever

outlawz2004

iTrader: (18)

I like my pacesetters, but I dont see how there could be that much of a difference between the two on hp.

GMCtrk

iTrader: (27)

Ive seen a back to back comparison article on an SBC between headers with a high velocity merge collector and those without being a 12 HP difference on an engine dyno. But neither pacesetters or LPP have it so it's not relevant. There shouldnt be much of any difference btw the two in power.

Mr.Nobody

iTrader: (1)

so this guy could have just put high velocity merge collectors on it, i was wonderin cause im getting ready to put that tr224 cam in and want to be right as far as bolt ons go...

zachm89

iTrader: (16)

the overall design of both headers is almost exactly the same, except pc has the egr port on the passenger side header and the LPP are stainless...other than that i dont see how the hell there would be a 20hp difference between the two. id say go with whichever one you want...i just ordered a set of the LPP headers, had pacesetters on my last truck with no problems..just wanted to try something new.

Mangled03gmc

iTrader: (95)

They are basically the same headers.. So that is not a true statement

viciousknid

iTrader: (8)

WERD

He's full of shat and Tuning makes a big difference in HP when you have a cam.