Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Interesting info 799 vs 243/706 discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-11-2020, 05:39 PM
  #11  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (40)
 
00pooterSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dallas
Posts: 3,189
Received 257 Likes on 215 Posts
Default

Your truck sounds like an excellent combo

Got a pic of it?
Old 02-11-2020, 05:41 PM
  #12  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
madmann26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Somewhere north of 285, south of 985.
Posts: 2,987
Received 371 Likes on 299 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 00pooterSS
Your truck sounds like an excellent combo

Got a pic of it?
Heh


Old 02-11-2020, 05:43 PM
  #13  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (40)
 
00pooterSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dallas
Posts: 3,189
Received 257 Likes on 215 Posts
Default

Love it man. All of it.

Miss my 04 ecsb all the time. It was a spring special and had a couple of cool things about it that were different than most. Only came in indigo blue, 2wd with torsion bars, dual piston rears, every option you could get. Was a cool truck, but slow. It had the "high performance suspension" lol (apparently that's what they called that suspension that came on those, the VHO and the SS) aka 2wd with torsion bars. Also came with 20" stock

Last edited by 00pooterSS; 02-11-2020 at 05:54 PM.
Old 02-11-2020, 05:55 PM
  #14  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
madmann26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Somewhere north of 285, south of 985.
Posts: 2,987
Received 371 Likes on 299 Posts
Default

1st gear shifts @ 52'ish - lol

The suspension is a hodge podge of stuff. I have a 5-leaf pack from a 1500hd in the rear.
The following users liked this post:
00pooterSS (02-11-2020)
Old 02-11-2020, 05:59 PM
  #15  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (40)
 
00pooterSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dallas
Posts: 3,189
Received 257 Likes on 215 Posts
Default

Mine shifted at 50 also, wrapping out 1st to 6500 lol
Old 02-11-2020, 06:11 PM
  #16  
Teching In
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 00pooterSS
Mine shifted at 50 also, wrapping out 1st to 6500 lol
your truck felt good.. you had a good tuner.
Old 02-11-2020, 07:37 PM
  #17  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (40)
 
00pooterSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dallas
Posts: 3,189
Received 257 Likes on 215 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by slow99gsr
your truck felt good.. you had a good tuner.
It did good for what it was, would pull equally modded single cabs by a little.

But good god it fell on it's face shifting to second so bad. Hit 2nd right at 50, didn't pull for **** in second till up in the 60's. So many deadzones

I do not miss 4 speed autos
Old 02-11-2020, 08:29 PM
  #18  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
madmann26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Somewhere north of 285, south of 985.
Posts: 2,987
Received 371 Likes on 299 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 00pooterSS
It did good for what it was, would pull equally modded single cabs by a little.

But good god it fell on it's face shifting to second so bad. Hit 2nd right at 50, didn't pull for **** in second till up in the 60's. So many deadzones

I do not miss 4 speed autos
Mine does not fall flat on it's face. Part throttle shift drop is 300-400rpms. It shifts quick and stays almost at the same rpm.
Old 02-12-2020, 10:32 AM
  #19  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
stroker87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 1,210
Received 68 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

in the corvette forum i remember a post that said the heads was the same just the way they was cast was different and the 799's was not as smooth so airflow was a little less, 799 ported though flowed as good as 243's ported (or it was really close)

the main reason the 243 was the hot ticket when they hit the street (before used on trucks) was they had light weight hollow stem valve to help with valve train control in the upper rpms on the ls6 engines (zo6 only 01-04)

@madmann26 looks good have not seen those rims before
Old 02-12-2020, 11:13 AM
  #20  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (40)
 
00pooterSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dallas
Posts: 3,189
Received 257 Likes on 215 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by madmann26
Mine does not fall flat on it's face. Part throttle shift drop is 300-400rpms. It shifts quick and stays almost at the same rpm.
Mine was a stock 5.3 with a stock stall. It had no shot in hell in climbing up that 1-2 shift drop on 32" tires, even with the 3.73's

Originally Posted by stroker87
in the corvette forum i remember a post that said the heads was the same just the way they was cast was different and the 799's was not as smooth so airflow was a little less, 799 ported though flowed as good as 243's ported (or it was really close)

the main reason the 243 was the hot ticket when they hit the street (before used on trucks) was they had light weight hollow stem valve to help with valve train control in the upper rpms on the ls6 engines (zo6 only 01-04)

@madmann26 looks good have not seen those rims before
Click the link I posted. It shows one of the big reasons the 243 flow better in stock form vs stock 799. It's the valve job. The 243 has a top cut (where the air enters the chamber out of the intake valve) and the 799 does not have it. Valve jobs (multi angle cuts on the valve seat and head) are a big area for power. I did notice the 706's had the same cut the 243 does, which means they really paid attention to flow in that area and part of the reason they are a great head.

And yes they are cast different. In ported form all this jazz goes out the window. Essentially the 243 is more finished than the 799 is stock form. And it looks like the 706 is along the lines of the 243

I really wish someone had a ton of detailed pictures of ports and chambers of all 3 heads so I can look at all the port shapes and chambers. I'm having a hard time finding a good source of OE pics. Ported pics are all over the place.

I know most wont understand, but most also dont understand a lot of the power comes from the valve job, not the port work on the port itself.


Quick Reply: Interesting info 799 vs 243/706 discussion



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:33 AM.