JBA shorty headers installed
11-18-2012, 05:01 PM
#1
Launching!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: TX
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
JBA shorty headers installed
Just finished installing JBA headers on my 2002 Tahoe with 5.3L engine. Did a before 0-60 on a G-tech which was 8.1 sec and after headers is 7.8 sec, so much for shorty headers not being any better than stock manifolds. Here is a picture before installation
11-18-2012, 10:08 PM
#3
Launching!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: TX
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I should have said this differently, I can't count the amount times it has done 0-60 in 8.1 sec, so this was the usual. After the headers first run was 7.7 then two more after that were 7.8, so no need to brag it is what it is.
11-20-2012, 02:43 PM
#4
Teching In
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
JBA Shorties
I put JBA shorty headers on mine, too. (CA smog laws and all) I know they are not nearly as good as tuned long tubes would be, but my SOP dyno felt a definite measurable upper rpm improvement over stock cast iron. Along those same lines, I also later put on some SLP 1.85 rockers. I also know that this is no substitute for a real cam change, but again I felt a very real increase in torque across the rpm range (and it was easy to do). I'm still slow, but less slow than before!
11-23-2012, 12:47 PM
#6
TECH Enthusiast
Anyone here do shorties with high flow metal matrix cats? That would be a more realistic comparison considering most LT headers come with high flow cats. It's still comparing apples and oranges but I am more than curious of what the power difference would be.
Trending Topics
11-25-2012, 10:14 AM
#9
TECH Enthusiast
I put JBA shorty headers on mine, too. (CA smog laws and all) I know they are not nearly as good as tuned long tubes would be, but my SOP dyno felt a definite measurable upper rpm improvement over stock cast iron. Along those same lines, I also later put on some SLP 1.85 rockers. I also know that this is no substitute for a real cam change, but again I felt a very real increase in torque across the rpm range (and it was easy to do). I'm still slow, but less slow than before!
I was told by several header manufacturers that the factory cats are very restrictive. I removed them from my 99 Vette early in the mod process and had only canned Hypertech tune, replaced later with Kooks LT's (no slight on Kooks product, they are quality product) and a dyno tune for only a 9 rwhp increase....in this case it was not a good return on investment in my opinion. I'm sure that I realized the benefits later when I installed supercharger.
11-25-2012, 11:42 AM
#10
Launching!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: TX
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE=NemesisC5;5029428]How much did these cost? I am assuming you ran these through factory cats? Did you tune afterwards?
Yes running through factory cats without a tune, the funny thing is I actually put these on to see if it would help Mpg and so far it looks like I got an extra mile to the gallon. I got them for $468 shipped from autoanything.
Yes running through factory cats without a tune, the funny thing is I actually put these on to see if it would help Mpg and so far it looks like I got an extra mile to the gallon. I got them for $468 shipped from autoanything.