L92 sheet metal intake on ebay...

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

07-13-2007, 07:15 PM

#11

nightrunner

Mr. Obvious

iTrader: (4)

Join Date: Jan 2006

Location: Manchester, TN

Posts: 6,006

Likes: 0

Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill Reid

Lord,
The L92 heads require a minimum 4" bore... so 5.3 guys have been excluded from this club

Bill

i thought they were designed for a 4.060" Bore?

very nice looking manifold

Reply Like

07-13-2007, 07:33 PM

#12

Bill Reid

Moderator

iTrader: (14)

Join Date: Mar 2003

Location: Chandler, AZ

Posts: 2,327

Likes: 0

Received 1 Like on 1 Post

... info I have is the L92's will work on a minimum 4" bore (L76 4" bore?). I cannot verify my info. If someone is serious about L92 heads and SICK lookin intakes... maybe shoot Richard at WCCH an email.

Bill

Last edited by Bill Reid; 07-13-2007 at 08:01 PM.

Reply Like

07-14-2007, 12:26 AM

#13

black2003ss

On The Tree

Thread Starter

Join Date: Jun 2006

Location: Waterford, MI

Posts: 105

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

L92's are good on a 4.000" bore. You can swap them onto a stock 6.0L LQ9, LQ4, LS2, etc.

Reply Like

07-16-2007, 08:17 PM

#14

Lord Aries

TECH Enthusiast

iTrader: (6)

Join Date: May 2005

Location: Greenville, SC

Posts: 687

Likes: 0

Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill Reid

Lord,
The L92 heads require a minimum 4" bore... so 5.3 guys have been excluded from this club

Bill

Figures...

Reply Like

07-16-2007, 11:15 PM

#15

Richard@WCCH

FormerVendor

iTrader: (3)

Join Date: May 2002

Location: Reseda, CA

Posts: 1,853

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

For the right price, this intake would be nicely suited for a hot rod truck application. I've seen this intake up close very recently and can attest to the high quality fabrication work. IMO the plenum is a bit small for a high rpm car setup, but a truck would really like the long runners. You can see some flow results of this intake and L92 heads posted here.

Good luck and happy bidding!

Richard

Reply Like

07-17-2007, 02:13 PM

#16

SS_bnoon_SS

TECH Enthusiast

iTrader: (3)

Join Date: Nov 2005

Location: West Des Moines, Iowa

Posts: 655

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by moes04silverado

i dont like how the inside was done - the runners should have been flush...not sticking up through the main runner

The runner length has something to do with it as well as getting equal air to all runners (no more lean #7 for instance). I'd like to see a more gentle bend going into the runners (more taper if you will) and some more plenum volume perhaps, but it's all speculation until I could measure it in my hands and see what cams would/wouldn't work with it. Intakes are surprizingly easy to calculate in theory for different combinations.