GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Lingenfelter Cams

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-07-2006 | 07:38 AM
  #11  
ap2002's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,411
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by TBSS
That 205/212 is an EXCELLENT cam for someone with a 5.3L who wants to keep the stock torque converter in their vehicle. I put an almost identically spec'd cam from Cam Motion into my Avalanche and it was perfect with the Radix (-16 degrees overlap). No need to pay $400 to Comp if you don't want to.
do you personally know of someone with the 205/212 in a 5.3 with stock converter?? Im wanting a small cam to put in the 07 Tahoe that will not require a stall....
Old 11-07-2006 | 12:25 PM
  #12  
Mr. Sandog's Avatar
TECH Veteran
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,632
Likes: 2
From: Sun Diego
Default

Originally Posted by ap2002
do you personally know of someone with the 205/212 in a 5.3 with stock converter?? Im wanting a small cam to put in the 07 Tahoe that will not require a stall....
Uh, that would be me. I had an almost identical cam in my Avalanche from Cam Motion - it was perfect for that 6,000 lb. beast and the stock converter. If I had it to do over again I would have simply ordered the Lingenfelter cam; it was cheaper.

Here are the specs on my Cam Motion 205/212, 548/540, 114+4 cam:

Lobe Separation = 114 cam deg
Valve Overlap = -18.6 crank deg

INTAKE
valve open = -8.1 BTDC
centerline = 110 ATDC
valve close = 33.1 ABDC
duration = 205 crank deg
lobe lift = .32236 in.
valve lift = .54802 in.
lobe area = 23.19 in * deg

EXHAUST
valve open = 42.8 BBDC
centerline = 118 BTDC
valve close = -10.4 ATDC
duration = 212.4 crank deg
lobe lift = .31728 in.
valve lift = .53938 in.
lobe area = 23.64 in * deg
Old 11-07-2006 | 12:36 PM
  #13  
Mr. Sandog's Avatar
TECH Veteran
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,632
Likes: 2
From: Sun Diego
Default

Only exception is the Lingenfelter will idle a little better and have less-peakey torque behavior due to the wider LSA. Mine did have a nice little lope...
Old 11-07-2006 | 04:39 PM
  #14  
DrX's Avatar
DrX
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,702
Likes: 6
From: Canada
Default

Are the above LPEs the best choice for overall performance in a Radixed 5.3 with longtubes/ORY and a 2600 stall TC? Or will a different grind perform better on this setup?
Old 11-07-2006 | 04:47 PM
  #15  
KY_BOB's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 640
Likes: 0
From: West KY
Default

Originally Posted by DrX
Are the above LPEs the best choice for overall performance in a Radixed 5.3 with longtubes/ORY and a 2600 stall TC? Or will a different grind perform better on this setup?
Let me add to this question. Would there be difference in cam selection for my Vortech since my boost doesn't build as quick.
Old 11-07-2006 | 09:27 PM
  #16  
dirtyratt's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: Flint MI
Default

I have the gt2-3 cam in my 5.3 stock convertor it works good.could use a stall thought alittle lag just off idle but then hold on after that . But im going to change over to the gt2-5 because im not going to be running a supercharger or turbo and want more lobe. From what I hear and read this is the best cam for thoughs setups
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bighouse
GM Parts Classifieds
8
08-14-2015 09:00 AM
lawhitediamante
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
5
08-12-2015 01:14 PM
steves86ta
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
5
07-28-2015 11:21 AM
WICK3DxGATA
FORCED INDUCTION
4
07-21-2015 07:59 PM
projectnightcrawler
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
5
07-20-2015 12:30 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:53 AM.