Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Lq9 L92 L76 232/236 In and running

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-07-2007, 07:03 PM
  #51  
Tin Foil Hat Wearin' Fool
iTrader: (36)
 
1slow01Z71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 23,204
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Pulling 9K with that relatively small cam in summer heat is going to cause some problems, hope you dont plan on towing too much with it anymore.
Old 04-07-2007, 08:28 PM
  #52  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (24)
 
joshluther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Casino, CT.
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Actually I think the motor is going in my s10.
Old 04-07-2007, 08:33 PM
  #53  
Tin Foil Hat Wearin' Fool
iTrader: (36)
 
1slow01Z71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 23,204
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Damn that is going to be nasty, what will be going back into teh rcsb?
Old 04-08-2007, 06:53 AM
  #54  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (24)
 
joshluther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Casino, CT.
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

cammed 5.3 or a mild 6.0 if I can find a block cheap
Old 04-08-2007, 06:30 PM
  #55  
TECH Apprentice
 
yurs78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Juda
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

with the stock 6.0 and a cam in the 230's how was the low to mid. I know it will be an animal on top but I'm most interested in the off idle power. I tow a lot too and I really want a package that will peak the tq well below 5k and have a minimum of 400fwtq at 2k. Right now I was thinking something 218/222 110lsa. I was hoping to get close to 500/500 at the crank with the same heads and intake, and around 10.5 CR. Am I completely dreaming or is something like this even possible?
Thanks for your thoughts.
Old 04-08-2007, 08:09 PM
  #56  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (24)
 
joshluther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Casino, CT.
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I was really impressed with the low end when my converter was locked. It would still put you in the seat just rolling on the throttle.

I don't think your dreaming. I think your cam choice is pretty conservative though. Cubes eat cams!! The difference is night and day with my 6.0 to 408 The 408 idles like stock 800 rpm 22* of timing the 6.0 laughed if tried that
Old 04-09-2007, 08:26 AM
  #57  
TECH Enthusiast
 
MikeZQ8SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Groton, Ct
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by joshluther
I was really impressed with the low end when my converter was locked. It would still put you in the seat just rolling on the throttle.
*cough cough* he ain't kiddin'
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
OHsixLS3
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
14
12-27-2016 09:30 AM
stealthperf
General Truck Racing and Discussion
34
02-14-2016 11:35 AM
The_W
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
1
10-28-2015 09:00 PM
USMCvet0311
SHOW & SHINE DISCUSSION
12
09-30-2015 10:34 AM
Denali08
FORCED INDUCTION
12
08-09-2015 04:34 PM



Quick Reply: Lq9 L92 L76 232/236 In and running



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:30 PM.