Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

My dyno results after a Westers tune...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-20-2004, 11:36 PM
  #11  
what a rush!
iTrader: (8)
 
moregrip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 17,611
Received 28 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by F8L Z71
very nice #s man!!!

Was that corrected or uncorrected?

Please post up the sheet I wanna see it. This is exciting!
you want to see everyones ****, I mean sheet
Old 11-20-2004, 11:40 PM
  #12  
12 Second Truck Club
 
F8L Z71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 5,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by moregrip
you want to see everyones ****, I mean sheet
LOL

I know, I'm a junkie when it comes to comparing dyno sheets. Peak #s dont hold much water with me..

Did you ever send me yours? I didn't see them come through but with all the thread reply notices things get lost. I'll check again. LOL
Old 11-20-2004, 11:42 PM
  #13  
what a rush!
iTrader: (8)
 
moregrip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 17,611
Received 28 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by F8L Z71
LOL

I know, I'm a junkie when it comes to comparing dyno sheets. Peak #s dont hold much water with me..

Did you ever send me yours? I didn't see them come through but with all the thread reply notices things get lost. I'll check again. LOL
I posted it and sent you my home email address to send you the file but I never got a response from you.

You'll need WinPep to veiw it, but you probably have it

let me know, just PM me your email addy
Old 11-21-2004, 03:13 AM
  #14  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
AZ Power & Sound's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by onequick5.3
Get a 2.8 pulley, and is the gas in AZ really that bad? I would try to tune for 91 octane just to see what shes got in her. How do you like those shorties? You would gain alot more with the Dynatech system. You probley already know this but, Radix+2.8+custom tune+long tubes= 12's on 22's easily. Then put on some 16's and see if you can hit 11's. Oh did I mention a stall and built trans. And by the way, and I have said this before, Your truck is badass.
Dynatech system is sitting in stock for him... as well as his cam All a matter of time!
Old 11-21-2004, 03:15 AM
  #15  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
AZ Power & Sound's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by F8L Z71
LOL

I know, I'm a junkie when it comes to comparing dyno sheets. Peak #s dont hold much water with me..
411 ft lbs of torque at 3100 rpm
Old 11-21-2004, 04:58 AM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Hardtop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: LaPlata, Md.
Posts: 1,704
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Very nice. I wonder what you would have pulled if you had the stock 16's on it. Congrats.

Bruce
Old 11-21-2004, 11:17 AM
  #17  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Todd@AZPowerAndSound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 1,495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

uncorrected peak hp was 387. sae 1.03

Ill get a graph up monday. All the way through the graph the power is up at least 10-20 horse and pulls away at the end. Torque is up throughout, no less than 20 from 3000-5000 then it comes down to abuot 10 over at the end of the run. It most certainly made power throughout. Im not a peak number guy either. The truck is a completely different animal now.

Drivability is great. I can go all day and never make the charger whine (but why the hell would I do that).

Xfactor...I see NO reason you cant make 400. Im there with my 5.3 and you have better air, more ci, and im sure youll have better headers, and smaller wheels.

At this point im aiming for 475/475. That will include a very mild cam, dynatech headers, and a more agressive tune. Now that I know Westers REALLY knows their stuff...im very excited about exploring it more. Will be looking for a 80e at this point.
Old 11-21-2004, 11:52 AM
  #18  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Great #'s man! Very nice gain with Tune!
Old 11-21-2004, 12:21 PM
  #19  
12 Second Club
 
O3GMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Awesome numbers - amazing what a little timing can do Allen got me about 18hp/30tq over the mail tune he sent me when I went and dynoed - I think it was 1 deg of timing and leaned out a tad.

I need to go dyno on a dynojet to compare to everyone's numbers. I think my numbers would be very close to yours, maybe more torque. I got 338/393 on the loaded Superflow dyno and I'm told these numbers are about 10-15% lower than dynojet numbers.

Congrats on a badass truck
Old 11-21-2004, 12:51 PM
  #20  
12 Second Truck Club
 
F8L Z71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 5,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I didn't use a dynojet dang you! :p

Glad to se the #s up everywhere in the powerband. That is really great!

Gotta love that kind of power!


Quick Reply: My dyno results after a Westers tune...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:24 AM.