Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Is my Stock MAF hurting my Camd 6L preformance?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-09-2013, 02:48 PM
  #11  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
nonnieselman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Crystal Springs, MS
Posts: 14,068
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

You can gut the screen.. but majority of the time it leads to weird issues with Fueling. The screen is there for straighten out the air flow over the sensors in the MAF so it can get an accurate reading of how much air is incoming. Not to keep foreign objects out like the air filter does
It can actually hurt the performance if the acts weird.

Coolant goin thru the Throttle body acutally is needed up north where it gets kinda cold.. Throttle will stick open. Not all the time, its just there to prevent the issue.

The Federal .gov says Catalytic converters are needed.. not me..
Old 04-09-2013, 02:55 PM
  #12  
Moderator
iTrader: (19)
 
TXsilverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Humble Texas
Posts: 18,319
Received 226 Likes on 150 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nonnieselman
You can gut the screen.. but majority of the time it leads to weird issues with Fueling. The screen is there for straighten out the air flow over the sensors in the MAF so it can get an accurate reading of how much air is incoming. Not to keep foreign objects out like the air filter does
It can actually hurt the performance if the acts weird.

Coolant goin thru the Throttle body acutally is needed up north where it gets kinda cold.. Throttle will stick open. Not all the time, its just there to prevent the issue.

The Federal .gov says Catalytic converters are needed.. not me..
this. i removed the screen on my MAF, then had to find a unmolested maf after finding some weird issues. the difference between a stock maf and an aftermarket MAF is the stock one works better (probably because of the screen)

ditch the MAF and go speed density if it bothers you.
Old 04-09-2013, 02:55 PM
  #13  
TECH Regular
 
BIGDADDY1969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: South Louisiana-With "Swamp People"
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Originally Posted by nonnieselman

The Federal .gov says Catalytic converters are needed.. not me..




^^^^ I second that ^^^^
Old 04-09-2013, 03:41 PM
  #14  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
WhiteChevy3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

@wicked, I have seen like others the the screen being removed can make things act weird. Like nonnie said "the screen is not there to keep objects out, lol.
I can assure that a dyno run with the screen in and out would add little to no gain.
Yes I have a modded stock air box, as I am sure it flows and keeps out hot air and elements better than the conical style...
Old 04-09-2013, 03:47 PM
  #15  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
nonnieselman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Crystal Springs, MS
Posts: 14,068
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

My stock airbox worked alot better than the K&N intake i use to have. but yea tune it SPeed density and see if you pick up anything without the MAF.
Old 04-09-2013, 05:10 PM
  #16  
Teching In
 
wickedRCSB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

1. i know what the coolant going through the tb is suposed to do. i dont think i need to thaw out my tb in texas.

2. screw what the government wants. deleting the rear o2's allows to me pass an inspection thats all i care about.

3. im pretty sure reputable brands such as lingenfelter, granatelli , jet.. have done there research, and i dont see screens in them.

yeah straighening the air flow sounds good in theory and that write up had alot of data behind it. but no comparison. AGAIN, i stated that removing the screen makes them similiar to aftermarket units as listed to let the OP know its not worth investing in an aftermarket one, since theres minimal gains to be had.
Old 04-09-2013, 05:22 PM
  #17  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (137)
 
low2001gmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Elsa, South Texas (956) 802-7700
Posts: 1,109
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wickedRCSB
1. i know what the coolant going through the tb is suposed to do. i dont think i need to thaw out my tb in texas.

2. screw what the government wants. deleting the rear o2's allows to me pass an inspection thats all i care about.

3. im pretty sure reputable brands such as lingenfelter, granatelli , jet.. have done there research, and i dont see screens in them.

yeah straighening the air flow sounds good in theory and that write up had alot of data behind it. but no comparison. AGAIN, i stated that removing the screen makes them similiar to aftermarket units as listed to let the OP know its not worth investing in an aftermarket one, since theres minimal gains to be had.
im with you. ive removed them without any real issues. i do however hope in the future to do speed density tuning.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Noah Burns
GMT K2xx Trucks General Discussion
12
10-05-2015 06:46 AM
HectorM52
GM Parts Classifieds
11
08-18-2015 12:40 PM
noproblems209
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
12
08-10-2015 06:57 PM
rojeho
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion
4
08-08-2015 07:20 PM
V-seriesTech
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
2
07-28-2015 12:28 PM



Quick Reply: Is my Stock MAF hurting my Camd 6L preformance?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:30 AM.