Need help for cam choice 4 nnbs?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

03-15-2009, 02:24 PM

#11

budhayes3

PT's Slowest Truck

iTrader: (19)

Join Date: Apr 2004

Location: Hackensack, NJ

Posts: 17,863

Likes: 0

Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by LaTampSStyle'

how about a reverse lift type cam?would this cam work a 226/230 600. lift on a 110lsa?i heard it will work but as soon as i get a chance to get head work.askin for opinions!!

I agree with POP, that cam's too big for your converter...that isn't a reverse split btw, a reverse split would have a larger intake duration. I still like my and ap2002's recommendation if you plan on sticking with the 3200 verter.

Reply Like

03-15-2009, 04:58 PM

#12

LaTampSStyle'

On The Tree

Thread Starter

Join Date: Nov 2008

Posts: 102

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

i know it's not a reverse split what i ment was how about any opinions on a reverse split cam?

Reply Like

03-15-2009, 06:01 PM

#13

budhayes3

PT's Slowest Truck

iTrader: (19)

Join Date: Apr 2004

Location: Hackensack, NJ

Posts: 17,863

Likes: 0

Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by LaTampSStyle'

i know it's not a reverse split what i ment was how about any opinions on a reverse split cam?

Gotcha

Well, IMO, unless the intake is restrictive and the exhaust flow far exceeds the intake's flow capabilities, then a reverse split would not be beneficial.

Reply Like

03-15-2009, 08:10 PM

#14

sonoma43

TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (1)

Join Date: Jul 2005

Location: Saint Joseph, MI

Posts: 1,279

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by budhayes3

Gotcha

Well, IMO, unless the intake is restrictive and the exhaust flow far exceeds the intake's flow capabilities, then a reverse split would not be beneficial.

I agree with that! I also think that the TR220 would be a good cam, however I think that the 222/224 should also be looked at.