GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Need a Intake Manifold for my H/C lq9

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-15-2013 | 10:55 AM
  #11  
skolman91's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,018
Likes: 57
From: muncie IN
Default

Originally Posted by twolow02fransen
IMO the pro-flo XT isnt worth it either unless you plan to run steep gears and a big converter with high compression. theres a big thread on that intake on here pretty sure its RAFFMAN that did the post he lost bottom end TQ and PWR on his procharged 370 when he did the pro-flo XT. plus theres heat soak with the aluminum.

BGRAYS setup is very similar to mine i looked at every option the best i could find was the TBSS/NNBS intake only other option was a fast 92mm or a fast 102mm for a f-body aka LSXR but i dont want anything to do with fast products anymore I'm pretty sure BGRAY dosent either.
I know about the slight low end tq loss, but from what ive read its only around 10ft lbs or so until mid range rpm then its same if not more tq above.. And Hp is better across the board with it, im not sure exactly what he uses his truck for but i assumed it was mostly show not racing and a nice intake would be easy on the eyes when you pop the hood.. and any decently sized converter would cover up the few ft lbs lost down low..
my only concern was the tuning capability of it, which i assume it has to be better than a shitty flexing fast piece, id hope at least..lol
just my 2cents..
and i dont disagree with tbss intake is an option, it does make more power i had it done on my last truck, but it just looks so god awful (unless covered up) when you pop the hood and doesnt scream "performance" when you see it..
Old 05-15-2013 | 02:14 PM
  #12  
02_Orange_D1SC's Avatar
Fastest D1 Procharged Truck
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,132
Likes: 0
From: mASSHOLE
Default

Originally Posted by bgray
**** I dunno what to do guys. LAst thing i want to do is **** around again with a intake that isnt proven! **** it loosk good tho lol


Think im gonna put the stocker one, 6.0 engine covers, and call it a day. Im tired of ******* around.
if you mostly just cruise the truck like me do a TBSS/NNBS setup with a engine cover you wont regret it other then maybe in the looks department
Old 05-15-2013 | 04:39 PM
  #13  
oakley6575's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 5,235
Likes: 4
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

Yea if you are going to put the stocker on, then at least get the TBSS.
Old 05-15-2013 | 04:58 PM
  #14  
AKlowriderZ71's Avatar
11 Second Hall Moniter
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 11,651
Likes: 8
From: Wyoming
Default

https://www.performancetrucks.net/fo...-rails-517809/
Old 05-15-2013 | 06:09 PM
  #15  
2doorfury's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 2
From: Franklin, IN
Default

Jesus! What intake is that AK??
Old 05-15-2013 | 06:33 PM
  #16  
02_Orange_D1SC's Avatar
Fastest D1 Procharged Truck
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,132
Likes: 0
From: mASSHOLE
Default

Originally Posted by 2doorfury
Jesus! What intake is that AK??
thats a pro-flo XT looks badass but like i stated earlier he's goin to loose some low end TQ DARK HALO and RAFFMAN both used this intake and they both had the same outcome loss of low end grunt and thats not something you want in a truck unless you've got alot of cubes or a blower or turbo to make up for it
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
byrne_06
WTB (Wanted To Buy)
1
04-29-2017 03:19 PM
OHsixLS3
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
14
12-27-2016 10:30 AM
USMCvet0311
SHOW & SHINE DISCUSSION
12
09-30-2015 11:34 AM
Hmguyton
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
6
07-07-2015 04:29 PM
Black-Syde
WTB (Wanted To Buy)
0
07-06-2015 03:12 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:40 AM.