Performance specs on all stock trucks
#26
formerly 1BADC10 (12/14/2011)
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: TX
Posts: 2,135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by La Chochita
All stock, 15.0 @ 91mph.
#27
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ktmrider
Hard thing is that the 6.0L was only were installed in HD, SUV, and 3/4 ton+ trucks up until the VHO option in 05'. Nothing in a RC configuration. Might be an apples to oranges comparison.
Plenty of info on the 4.8 tho. Only difference on the motors is stroke, this is why the HP figures are close ( 270 vs 285 ) but the torque is huge ( 275 vs 320 ). The extra torque really gets these big rolling bricks going off the line faster.
Plenty of info on the 4.8 tho. Only difference on the motors is stroke, this is why the HP figures are close ( 270 vs 285 ) but the torque is huge ( 275 vs 320 ). The extra torque really gets these big rolling bricks going off the line faster.
#29
Stock form best out of 5 runs I ran 15.42 in the 1/4mile with my 04 rc sb 5.3.
Sad thing is after adding a Magnaflow single in dual out & a K&N drop in I only pulled a 15.37@88.38! I only gained half of a 1/10 in the 1/4 mile after spending nearly $600 dollars! I assume that TQ mngmt has something to do with holding back those mods.
Sad thing is after adding a Magnaflow single in dual out & a K&N drop in I only pulled a 15.37@88.38! I only gained half of a 1/10 in the 1/4 mile after spending nearly $600 dollars! I assume that TQ mngmt has something to do with holding back those mods.
#30
15.42 is good. Although you should have picked up more than .05 seconds! I think the weather conditions/temperature may have been different.
Well 15.4 is what I should expect. I'm hoping my custom tune will help alot. Maybe .25.
Well 15.4 is what I should expect. I'm hoping my custom tune will help alot. Maybe .25.