Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Projected build... Comments, concerns, advice welcomed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-08-2011, 04:46 PM
  #11  
11 Second Hall Moniter
iTrader: (22)
 
AKlowriderZ71's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 11,651
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Since you are set on that intake & cam combo(on stock heads??..........), it's going to be a dog for a daily driver, unless you run a higher stall speed converter. 3800-ish is when that combo will "wake up". Don't get us wrong, it will be a high rpm SCREAMER(unless the stock heads choke the **** out of it), but your daily driving will suffer.

If you can handle a loose & high revving converter on a day-to-day basis, then go ahead with your plans. If you want something with some bottom end grunt, that you don't have to rev to the moon to make power, then you need to rethink your plans. The use of a 60/65E in your heavy SUV is also a bad idea, in my opinion.

BTW, I'd bet that cam you have would LOVE nitrous.... Are you building a race SUV, or a daily-driver street bruiser?
Old 10-08-2011, 05:19 PM
  #12  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Yukon04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ft. Bragg NC
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I want to build a street beast suv and play at the track but I really enjoy a good quick take off, I can always sell the cam because I'm pretty sure a converter of that stall speed will not be enjoyable on the street..... I was wanting to keep the LSXRT but I guess I can sell that too lol I was really hoping to stick with a 65e since I'm also awd and thats Alot to convert maybe with 410 or 456 the 65e will be freed up a little
Old 10-08-2011, 05:42 PM
  #13  
Baltimore Whore
iTrader: (95)
 
Mangled03gmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: In a van DOWN BY THE RIVER
Posts: 16,820
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Well if you can sell it, I would, find a better suited cam for your particular set up.. Yah that cam would be beast in a 3500lb car with a 3800 converter..
Old 10-08-2011, 06:38 PM
  #14  
Man Motor club
 
rjwz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sunniest city on Earth
Posts: 2,623
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Check the LSXRT with a straightedge. If it's good, use it. Guys were getting them and trying to bolt them on and finding out the ports were warped, that's the issue. If you've already got it, check it. Also, in the unfortunate event that it is warped, there's already been one member on here who successfully had it fixed by FAST. Don't sweat the intake manifold.
Old 10-08-2011, 07:34 PM
  #15  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
zero2sixT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Deer park, TX
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

How set are you on keeping it N/A? I personally would never run a cammed 6.0 in a vehicle that heavy. Basically b/c running a bigger cam is going to suck in city driving. And running a smaller cam is going to dissapoint on the highway.

For nearly the same money, you could run FI and put more power to the ground and have a better DD.

If you want to keep it N/A. Get some ported 243s. Keep the intake and run that cam. To optimize your setup for 1/4 mi performance, yes you need to run a bigger stall. But for street use, it wouldn't hurt to run a lower rpm stall converter and leave a little WOT performance from a dig on the table. Running a 80e behind a cammed 6.0, or even a h/c/i 6.0 is going to suck. I wouldn't want to do it.

If it was my truck and money, I'd go with a kb 2.8. I'd look for a used one in good shape. Sell the intake for LT money. Sell the cam for blower cam money. Run a tbss intake. Then run the 80e behind it. I'd wait on the 4.10s just to see how it ran with the stockers (prob 3.42s). Beauty, IMO, of fi is the fact you can make a shitload of power with stock heads and intake. And the lower compression of the lq4 will allow for more boost.
Old 10-08-2011, 07:40 PM
  #16  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Yukon04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ft. Bragg NC
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zero2sixT
How set are you on keeping it N/A? I personally would never run a cammed 6.0 in a vehicle that heavy. Basically b/c running a bigger cam is going to suck in city driving. And running a smaller cam is going to dissapoint on the highway.

For nearly the same money, you could run FI and put more power to the ground and have a better DD.

If you want to keep it N/A. Get some ported 243s. Keep the intake and run that cam. To optimize your setup for 1/4 mi performance, yes you need to run a bigger stall. But for street use, it wouldn't hurt to run a lower rpm stall converter and leave a little WOT performance from a dig on the table. Running a 80e behind a cammed 6.0, or even a h/c/i 6.0 is going to suck. I wouldn't want to do it.

If it was my truck and money, I'd go with a kb 2.8. I'd look for a used one in good shape. Sell the intake for LT money. Sell the cam for blower cam money. Run a tbss intake. Then run the 80e behind it. I'd wait on the 4.10s just to see how it ran with the stockers (prob 3.42s). Beauty, IMO, of fi is the fact you can make a shitload of power with stock heads and intake. And the lower compression of the lq4 will allow for more boost.
I like this........ I like this alot, as a matter of fact maybe I should follow your lead and do exactly this. Although with a magnacharger since they are alot easier to find. Truck has 373 gear I believe as well, Im sending you a PM with some additional questions.
Old 10-08-2011, 08:11 PM
  #17  
Man Motor club
 
rjwz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sunniest city on Earth
Posts: 2,623
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Well hell if we knew you were open to FI a blower would've been the first suggestion best of luck
Old 10-08-2011, 08:16 PM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
1Bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Jones Creek, Texas
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Going with a milder combination and supercharging it would definitely make for a more enjoyable daily driver and in all likelihood quicker to boot..
Old 10-08-2011, 08:23 PM
  #19  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Yukon04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ft. Bragg NC
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just when I thought I had this figured out now where do I go, what do I do, all the options there are, anyone want to offer a good combo to try, keep in mind this truck has stabiltrac well It might I think I have disabled it, it seems to be locked up now full time, I removed the TREC fuse, also keep in mind I have a 4l65e that I do not really want to switch to a 4l80. Procharger or Magnacharger?
Old 10-09-2011, 03:31 AM
  #20  
Man Motor club
 
rjwz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sunniest city on Earth
Posts: 2,623
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

If you want any reliability in your heavy, powerful truck, you will swap to an 80E. Wait until you blow up the 65E if you must, but regardless of how you plan to make the power, big horsepower and heavy weight make short work of the 4L60/65/70E transmissions.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bearden86
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
26
11-15-2015 03:58 PM
03sierraslt
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
14
10-09-2015 05:53 AM
blackedoutchevy22
FUEL SYSTEMS
4
10-01-2015 08:07 PM
Chevy305
GMT 900 Trucks General Discussion
5
09-28-2015 09:21 PM



Quick Reply: Projected build... Comments, concerns, advice welcomed



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:36 AM.