Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Radix & Burnt Intake Valves

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-01-2005, 04:27 PM
  #11  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I dont know about the 6.0 heads for one reason. I know a guy that put a Procharger on his 5.3 turned the boost up to see how much hp he could get and burnt up the 7 piston. Then he bought the Ligenfelter 6.0 ported heads that were very expensive a new cam and pistons. He put the 6.0 heads on and it wasnt making the kind of power he thought it should. Then he re installed the stock heads and made more power with them. I dont know why if someone knows please inform me. BTW he now makes 550rwhp with a ex cab 5.3
Old 01-01-2005, 04:55 PM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Flyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Armpit of East TX
Posts: 9,342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

There could have been way to many variables in yor buds truck that are not even thought of here. It's a fact that stock 6.0 heads outflow the 5.3 heads. It will also lower the compression ratio slightly to make more boost safer.

Those Lingenfelter heads could have bene poorly ported or something like that. I was talking about stock heads.
Old 01-01-2005, 05:03 PM
  #13  
TECH Apprentice
 
hink9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: oklahoma city
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

intake flow isnt as important on fi as n/a, i think you would be wasting your money on a set of heads, you would see more gain from a camswap and better tuning, as far as tuning makeing burnt intake valves i dont see how, the reason they burnt was from the o/h problem and the pressurized cold air from the s/c, warped the valve stem.
Old 01-01-2005, 07:43 PM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
 
ktmrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Cam and tuning first. I would still look at the #317 6.0L heads tho....
Old 01-01-2005, 08:32 PM
  #15  
? ? ? ? ? ?
iTrader: (16)
 
BigTex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: East of Dallas
Posts: 7,126
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I wouldn't do 317 6L heads on a 5.3 either, I'd go with stock LS6 heads. You'd drop the CR to just over 9:1, have much better flow, and have a great combustion chamber design. Those items will help you resist detonation, yet it should still be plenty responsive.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
The_W
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
1
10-28-2015 09:00 PM
jroctpb
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
9
08-11-2015 03:52 PM
BennyB
GM Parts Classifieds
15
08-01-2015 08:48 AM
jrplz
GM Parts Classifieds
6
07-09-2015 12:07 AM
08DenaliT
FORCED INDUCTION
9
07-08-2015 09:13 PM



Quick Reply: Radix & Burnt Intake Valves



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:25 AM.