Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Radix GT2-3, LS2 90MM TB Results 94 RWHP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-08-2006, 12:52 PM
  #41  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
SS_bnoon_SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: West Des Moines, Iowa
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2004Denali
installed: 105 lbs @ 1.200
open: 293lbs @ 1.200...

...coil bind 1.085
Are you sure you got the installed height typed right? It should be somewhere more like 1.7"-1.8" or somewhere around there for installed height on LSx heads. You just need to make sure you stay away from coil bind lift values for sure... at a 1.2" installed height, you could only get .115" max lift! LOL!
Old 05-08-2006, 12:58 PM
  #42  
blownerator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
BlownChevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1986
Location: Chatsworth, CA
Posts: 18,745
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

ole' Blown364 just grew a set and picked up a GT2-3 from me.....I see some low 11 second time slips coming out of that truck soon!
Old 05-08-2006, 01:30 PM
  #43  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
02sierraz71_5.3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cornelius, NC
Posts: 3,473
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

350+ rwtq @ 2200 rpms = YES PLEASE

Notice how everything dies around 5500 I think an ls6 intake with this combo could net another 20+ rw, FI or not
Old 05-08-2006, 01:33 PM
  #44  
blownerator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
BlownChevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1986
Location: Chatsworth, CA
Posts: 18,745
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 02sierraz71_5.3
350+ rwtq @ 2200 rpms = YES PLEASE

Notice how everything dies around 5500 I think an ls6 intake with this combo could net another 20+ rw, FI or not

HP is still going up at 5500 RPM.....If you are talking about the baseline, then yes it drops off. After the cam this truck pulled all the way to 6300RPM.
Old 05-08-2006, 01:37 PM
  #45  
blownerator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
BlownChevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1986
Location: Chatsworth, CA
Posts: 18,745
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Different View....We could have taken the dip out of the tail end of the graph with some more timing, but this was nice and safe.

Old 05-08-2006, 03:33 PM
  #46  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
vanillagorilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Arizona Bay
Posts: 4,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I keep coming back to this cam. It just flat out works, even on our bigger cubed f-body brethren. LPE did their homework on this cam and the GT7 too. I'm not sure but I don't think this cam shows up on the sniffer either.

I know LPE specs this cam and the GT7 for some of their twin turbo cars, but I'm very curious as to how it will perform with a single turbo. Hmmm...
Old 05-08-2006, 03:50 PM
  #47  
blownerator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
BlownChevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1986
Location: Chatsworth, CA
Posts: 18,745
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by vanillagorilla
I keep coming back to this cam. It just flat out works, even on our bigger cubed f-body brethren. LPE did their homework on this cam and the GT7 too. I'm not sure but I don't think this cam shows up on the sniffer either.

I know LPE specs this cam and the GT7 for some of their twin turbo cars, but I'm very curious as to how it will perform with a single turbo. Hmmm...

Do it man, everyone is
Old 05-08-2006, 06:02 PM
  #48  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 1,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BlownChevy
Thanks Ben! I beg to differ with you about the stock Radix calibration though, there is no where near 50 HP left on the table. I would say no more than 10-15 at the MOST.
I don't agree, but we're both just guessing without dyno results from the two different tunes, right? Unless you have some.
Old 05-08-2006, 06:04 PM
  #49  
blownerator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
BlownChevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1986
Location: Chatsworth, CA
Posts: 18,745
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BenKey
I don't agree, but we're both just guessing without dyno results from the two different tunes, right? Unless you have some.

Not trying to start a pissing match here....But do you REALLY think there is 50 RWHP left on the table with the Magnuson tune?
Old 05-08-2006, 06:08 PM
  #50  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 1,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BlownChevy
Not trying to start a pissing match here....But do you REALLY think there is 50 RWHP left on the table with the Magnuson tune?
I said as much as. Maybe not on a completely stock truck. One with headers and opened up exhaust it would be close to 40. I have heard numerous tuners talk about how much the Radix tune leaves on the table. I know what it did to my truck.

PCMFORLESS got 30+ to the wheels from a tune change on a completely stock vehicle. I think a Radix'd truck would respond even more.


Quick Reply: Radix GT2-3, LS2 90MM TB Results 94 RWHP



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:10 PM.