Radix Track Times
05-17-2004, 01:07 PM
#11
TECH Junkie
Good times. There is .2 you can pick-up in your 60' but you will need a converter to get 'em both. I think you'll have to be closer to 100mph to see a 13. sec. pass. JMO. You've got the Harley fords and Hemi's covered. 
What other mods?
05-17-2004, 01:12 PM
#14
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Norman, OK
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by whitt1
Good times. There is .2 you can pick-up in your 60' but you will need a converter to get 'em both. I think you'll have to be closer to 100mph to see a 13. sec. pass. JMO. You've got the Harley fords and Hemi's covered. What other mods?
05-17-2004, 01:15 PM
#16
12 Second Truck Club
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 5,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Depending on gearing and weight sometimes you can't get better 60's for a particular MPH... I'm stuck at 2.0 60's till I make more power or change gearing or try to lose more weight somehow. I choose the turbo to fix my 60's 
There are a few people in the fastest truck list with MPH similar to mine but with much better ETs. I just cant get off the line and faster
There are a few people in the fastest truck list with MPH similar to mine but with much better ETs. I just cant get off the line and faster
05-17-2004, 02:01 PM
#18
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Armpit of East TX
Posts: 9,342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Flyer
That is what a bud's stock 4.8 ran but at 16.2-16.3 ET's
I was running 14.35 with headers, intake, same exhaust, 160* thermo, and a Yank TT3000 with NO computer programming. 14.35 @ 93 or 91, can't remember which. It was either 91.3 or 93.1 ... for some reason 93.1 seems right cause I was calling it a solid mph. The blower and the cam were good for almost 2 whole seconds. I still say he should be good for 13's. You just need some traction though.
