GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Relocating MAF

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-04-2004 | 10:41 PM
  #1  
TwoFast's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 0
From: Mesquite, TX
Default Relocating MAF

Has anyone done this. I was thinking of moving right in front of the throttle body to get more accurate results. Would there be any gains in this would it make your truck run better because its getting more accurate readings? Just wondering.
Old 01-04-2004 | 10:49 PM
  #2  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,581
Likes: 0
From: Azle/Saginaw, Tx
Default

bigtex and oxidizr have both done it, and i believe tex said he noticed a good response gain. contact them and they can probably fill ya in
Old 01-05-2004 | 12:21 AM
  #3  
sit n' low's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
From: Hudson, CO
Default

i relocated mine there. i noticed a little better response. plus it sounds good

Old 01-05-2004 | 06:04 PM
  #4  
Teching In
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: South Carolina
Default

Isn't that inlet counter productive? You are essentially injesting hot air through from the radiator thus eliminating 'cold air induction'....right?
Old 01-05-2004 | 06:35 PM
  #5  
sit n' low's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
From: Hudson, CO
Default

not when you in the nw part of washington where it hasn't been getting over 30*. my truck runs at about 173* all the time also. have had no probs
Old 01-05-2004 | 06:59 PM
  #6  
Scream's Avatar
MOOBIES Moderator
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,924
Likes: 1
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

Well, your COOLANT has been 173*, but your inlet temps had to have increased. Looks like the factory intake would be better than sucking in all of that hot air.
Old 01-05-2004 | 07:32 PM
  #7  
kwkshift's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ
Default

I wouldn't move it. My experience with mass-air vehicles is that the MAF has to be a predetermined distance from the throttle body to get an accurate vacuum signal. The ecu's are generally calibrated for such.
Old 01-05-2004 | 07:44 PM
  #8  
sit n' low's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
From: Hudson, CO
Default

i've had it on autotap and all sensors read perfect
Old 01-06-2004 | 02:57 PM
  #9  
Texas Terminator's Avatar
11 Second Club
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 0
From: Beaver Falls, PA
Default

don't jack with it too much. it is true to a point the the closer it is to the tb, the more accurate it will be, but, you may encounter unwanted turbulence that will hurt you more than help you. certainly don't do it like the above pics with the heat we get in tx.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lucas287
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
31
01-12-2021 06:18 AM
REDCYCLE13
GM Parts Classifieds
1
09-15-2016 03:02 PM
JordanH
FORCED INDUCTION
4
10-03-2015 03:59 PM
02AWDAWSDenali
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
2
10-01-2015 05:08 PM
The_W
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
0
10-01-2015 02:35 PM



Quick Reply: Relocating MAF



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:17 AM.