Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

SDPC 5.3 Build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-01-2012, 10:19 AM
  #141  
Staging Lane
 
azchevydude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Since i have a 60e with 125k would a 5.3 build like this be better for the trans than a 6.0 that has lots more tq ? Also can i get this 327 with the new cam and heads already installed? would hate to remove brand new parts and replace......
Old 02-01-2012, 11:49 AM
  #142  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
BrutalSierra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: League City,TX
Posts: 1,309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Beau@SDPC
Quick update. Put the truck back on the rollers Saturday. Only change since the last dyno of 292rw/290tq was E-fans.

Any way to layer this on top of the 1st dyno pull so we can see the effect e-fans have through out the curve?
Old 02-01-2012, 12:29 PM
  #143  
Trucks Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
Beau@SDPC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 2,265
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by azchevydude
Since i have a 60e with 125k would a 5.3 build like this be better for the trans than a 6.0 that has lots more tq ? Also can i get this 327 with the new cam and heads already installed? would hate to remove brand new parts and replace......
Both would be extra stress to a tired trans. Hard to say what may lead to its death sooner.

We would be happy to install the performance parts here in our shop and send it to you that way. You can choose to keep the stock components, or we could offer you a small credit if we keep them.

Originally Posted by BrutalSierra
Any way to layer this on top of the 1st dyno pull so we can see the effect e-fans have through out the curve?
Unfortunately, the laptop that had the first run file on it crashed and we were not able to retrieve the files.
Old 02-01-2012, 12:36 PM
  #144  
Trucks Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
Beau@SDPC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 2,265
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

This is the best I could do. The gains are surprisingly noticeable throughout the entire power band. At 3500 rpm graphs show a 20rw/20ft. lb. difference.

Note, smoothing bewteen the two runs is different. Lower numerical smoothing increases peak numbers, however it varies less than 2rw/tq from 1-5


Last edited by Beau@SDPC; 02-01-2012 at 12:54 PM.
Old 02-05-2012, 01:06 PM
  #145  
TECH Enthusiast
 
NemesisC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Port Arthur, TX 77642
Posts: 718
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Checking In
Old 02-05-2012, 01:24 PM
  #146  
Mod with training wheels
iTrader: (16)
 
smokeshow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Detroit
Posts: 7,740
Received 204 Likes on 139 Posts
Default

Hit a little V-TAK at 4700 there, did ya??
Old 02-06-2012, 09:32 AM
  #147  
Trucks Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
Beau@SDPC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 2,265
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Yes, it is kind of an akward spike. Not sure what that was all about. I think if it was smoothed to 5, it would have cleaned that up a little bit and brought peak tq down some. I wish we still had that particular dyno file.
Old 09-04-2012, 05:34 PM
  #148  
Teching In
 
2006cory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: south mississippi
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i have a 06 chevy with a 5.3(2003 motor)! i got it bored 30 over flat top pistons oem. with a 212/218 557/563 lsa115(degreed to 111)! stock heads but put .600 pac racing springs and 7.4 crome molly push rods and a 3 angle valve job!compressions around 9.3-9.5! and boltons r a k&n intake with a 3/4 throt. spacer! pace setter long tubes with x pipe to 2 flow master 40s! built 4l60e 3500 ptc stall with extra bloon plates for nos. posi unit in the rear with 3.73s and i dynoed at furtral motor sports in walker la. an made 324 rwhp an 364 rwtq on 265/35/22s with hp tuner o and i have E fans is that pretty good? or does that seem kinda weak?
Old 09-04-2012, 05:36 PM
  #149  
Man Motor club
 
rjwz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sunniest city on Earth
Posts: 2,623
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I can't read! Your post! Because you don't know how to use punctuation!
Old 09-04-2012, 05:39 PM
  #150  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
Chevy_King1500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Jasper, IN
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2006cory
i have a 06 chevy with a 5.3(2003 motor)! i got it bored 30 over flat top pistons oem. with a 212/218 557/563 lsa115(degreed to 111)! stock heads but put .600 pac racing springs and 7.4 crome molly push rods and a 3 angle valve job!compressions around 9.3-9.5! and boltons r a k&n intake with a 3/4 throt. spacer! pace setter long tubes with x pipe to 2 flow master 40s! built 4l60e 3500 ptc stall with extra bloon plates for nos. posi unit in the rear with 3.73s and i dynoed at furtral motor sports in walker la. an made 324 rwhp an 364 rwtq on 265/35/22s with hp tuner o and i have E fans is that pretty good? or does that seem kinda weak?
START A NEW THREAD

PerformanceTrucks.net Forums - FAQ: Board FAQ


Quick Reply: SDPC 5.3 Build



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:48 AM.