GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

In seek of better mileage..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-02-2012 | 09:55 AM
  #41  
Development's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by TX Tahoe Z71
So what you're saying is larger displacement can make more power?
Hahahaha... I truly hope you're being sarcastic.
I'm just stating that with the larger displacement the usual is a lower fuel mileage... Of course there are thousands of factors that play. It would have to be the same vehicle setup with the only difference being the engine.

In your previous statements you were talking apples to oranges. It goes along the same lines as comparing a gas engine to diesel. You can't. The are different. Same goes with the 5.3 vs 6.0. Yes, they have interchangeable parts. But they are still different power/torque providers, fuel delivery amounts, burn rates, compression ratios. The list goes on. Thats all I was commenting on. This thread is coming from a 5.3 stand point. Your specific fuel numbers can't be compared to it.
Old 02-02-2012 | 10:22 AM
  #42  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 1
From: Michigan
Default

Again, the common rail Cummins trucks DO NOT get 24-25 at 70...Their mileage readouts are notoriously inaccurate...If your numbers aren't hand calculated over a long distance, then they don't mean anything.

As for 25 in a 6.2L truck...were you coasting down the side of a mountain?
Old 02-02-2012 | 11:06 AM
  #43  
11Silvy's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Default

I can get 17-18 in the city with a cai, bb 93 tune, headers, muff, and a pretty light foot (6.2)
Old 02-02-2012 | 11:15 AM
  #44  
Cknox121's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta,Georgia
Default

Originally Posted by TX Tahoe Z71
Who did the tune?
Blackbear. Let me re-fraze that, I didnt help at all at first, but after a bolt on or 2 i noticed a slit raise, maybe .5 to 1 mpg at best and thats on highway doing 65. I love the tune no doubt! its best mod ever. just havent see the mpg increase most people claim

But i do have 33'' mudgraps and rockstars so they are heavy as ****.
Old 02-02-2012 | 12:02 PM
  #45  
BrutalSierra's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,309
Likes: 0
From: League City,TX
Default

Originally Posted by MyLS1Hauls
Again, the common rail Cummins trucks DO NOT get 24-25 at 70...Their mileage readouts are notoriously inaccurate...If your numbers aren't hand calculated over a long distance, then they don't mean anything.

As for 25 in a 6.2L truck...were you coasting down the side of a mountain?
Nope No mountains in Houston,TX. Just cruising up 45N and 288S You'll also have to account i'm running on 245/70/17 general Grabbers that are harder than the concrete we drive on and they are low rolling resistance tires. When i had my factory 20's i could manage 22ish.

Also i took a roadtrip to east coast when i had 22's with 305/45/22 which is about 33" tall. I had cruise set at 78mph and got 17.4mps!
Old 02-06-2012 | 09:08 AM
  #46  
Development's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by MyLS1Hauls
Again, the common rail Cummins trucks DO NOT get 24-25 at 70...Their mileage readouts are notoriously inaccurate...If your numbers aren't hand calculated over a long distance, then they don't mean anything.

As for 25 in a 6.2L truck...were you coasting down the side of a mountain?
One of the exact reason why I was saying to get a true mileage reading. It would have to be 100% highway with a full to empty tank and 100% city full to empty tank. Even our readouts are known for being 7 - 11 % off. Thats quite a bit when calculating miles.

I personally do a pretty even mix of city vs highway driving and get right around 400-430 miles to a tank. That to me is a more tangible number since there is a combination.

Its not like we as owners bought these vehicles for fuel mileage anyhow. I bought mine to pull things and have fun. My cheapo motorcycle is the fuel saver.
Old 02-06-2012 | 09:55 AM
  #47  
06Sierra2's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 0
From: el paso, tx
Default

i get 18-19 highway with 22's, gears, cam, and full exhaust
Old 02-06-2012 | 06:19 PM
  #48  
Peragon's Avatar
FormerVendor
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
Default

Originally Posted by BrutalSierra
Gotcha! well here are some ideas...tonneau cover
Just in case you might be considering a tonneau, here's one that might interest you. https://www.performancetrucks.net/fo...5/#post4849052.

I have received a few calls from customers saying they've noticed about a 12% improvement in gas mileage. Our system weighs about 55 pounds total.

I adjusted my driving habits to improve my mileage. Depending where you drive, you may find that coasting more, braking less and slow acceleration will help a lot. Anticipating red lights, instead of trying to beat them will yield dividends too.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GXPJAY
Trucks and SUV Classifieds
5
02-13-2022 08:15 AM
JCW
FORCED INDUCTION
14
09-22-2015 03:59 PM
FlowmasterMufflers
THE TRUCK STOP
0
07-30-2015 04:29 PM
VTODD
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion
36
05-18-2012 07:24 AM
Mike@Diablosport
Cummins Diesel Performance
4
10-01-2008 07:07 PM



Quick Reply: In seek of better mileage..



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:27 PM.