which setup would be best?
#1
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 2,784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
which setup would be best?
For the time being Im going to get as much out of the Vortech S trim as possible since there is no upgrade program for the T trim. It would cost me 2K to "trade" up to a T trim. So when I get the house and wedding done I will be going with a turbo to feed the new 408.
For now Im going to get what I can out of the 5.3. Im going with a 212/218 low lift cam and am not sure about pulley sizing and shift points.
The max impellar speed for the S trim is 50K but many have spun them 7-10% over with no probs.
With the 3.12 pulley and 6500 shifts I would be turning at 56250.
If I went with a 2.95 and 6000 shifts I would see 54915 and see more boost sooner. Which do you think would be the better setup and why? Will that cam make that much more power at 6K+ to make it worthwhile?
Opinions are welcome too. Im looking for the most fun, not necessarily the fastest time as this is just to bide time.
For now Im going to get what I can out of the 5.3. Im going with a 212/218 low lift cam and am not sure about pulley sizing and shift points.
The max impellar speed for the S trim is 50K but many have spun them 7-10% over with no probs.
With the 3.12 pulley and 6500 shifts I would be turning at 56250.
If I went with a 2.95 and 6000 shifts I would see 54915 and see more boost sooner. Which do you think would be the better setup and why? Will that cam make that much more power at 6K+ to make it worthwhile?
Opinions are welcome too. Im looking for the most fun, not necessarily the fastest time as this is just to bide time.
#2
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: oklahoma
Posts: 1,721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2.9 and the lower shift. that cam will run out of steam right around 6200 so why push it, plus give you better throttle response and hopefully you willhave less lag with the smaller pulley.
#3
12 Second Truck Club
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 1,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2.9 and a lower shift point. As long as your belt won't slip. I think it's easier on an engine to get 30 rwhp with more boost as opposed to 30 more by spinning it higher.
Plus, your drop to rpm after a shift will be roughly the same regardless of the shift point because of your stall. So the 2.9 would be putting out more power at the bottom of a shift.
Plus, your drop to rpm after a shift will be roughly the same regardless of the shift point because of your stall. So the 2.9 would be putting out more power at the bottom of a shift.
#4
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 2,784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Black Blown 02
2.9 and a lower shift point. As long as your belt won't slip. I think it's easier on an engine to get 30 rwhp with more boost as opposed to 30 more by spinning it higher.
Plus, your drop to rpm after a shift will be roughly the same regardless of the shift point because of your stall. So the 2.9 would be putting out more power at the bottom of a shift.
Plus, your drop to rpm after a shift will be roughly the same regardless of the shift point because of your stall. So the 2.9 would be putting out more power at the bottom of a shift.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BROKE-aSS-BLAZER
GM Parts Classifieds
7
10-13-2017 03:50 PM
GMCtrk
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion
18
10-06-2015 03:48 PM