Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

So Many Choices.....What Will Give me the Best of Both?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-11-2009, 02:26 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
ChevyMan90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Central, Louisiana
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default So Many Choices.....What Will Give me the Best of Both?

I have a 1999 ECSB 5.7L Silverado with mods listed in sig. I'm ready to change up my exhaust a little and was wondering which would give me the best performance and sound. The truck from the factory is true dual into the muffler and one outlet. I have a dual in/dual out Super 40 at the moment.

So here's where we begin. I got a hold to a factory Y-Pipe for this year truck and I will be cutting the cats off and welding in some pipe in place of them. As far as the flange at the end goes I have laser cut two new ones so that the holes will be the same size. (One is bigger due to the converter.) So should I leave it true dual and run 2 mufflers with an H or X Pipe, OR make a Y-Pipe and run maybe 3 inch into one muffler? I have shorty headers and Im wondering which setup will give me a good sound but keep the performance I currently have. Thinking about going with Magnaflow this time, but I'm open for suggestions. Thanks

Last edited by ChevyMan90; 12-11-2009 at 09:07 PM.
Old 12-11-2009, 02:45 PM
  #2  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (16)
 
zachm89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ditch the shorties for a set of LT's, lose the cats like youre already planning on doing and to save money on pipe and mufflers go with the y-pipe to a single 3" magnaflow. And sometime down the road if you really want to see some more power out of it lose the hypertech and find someone to custom tune it. just a few suggestions

Zach
Old 12-11-2009, 02:54 PM
  #3  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
ChevyMan90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Central, Louisiana
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I bought the headers a while back like almost a year ago and had them ceramic coated and put them on about 2 months ago. It kinda sucked cause I have found a few, but not many companies that make longtubes for this truck/model, while I was waiting to get them back. Im tryin to sell that Hypertech at the moment and I'm getting it tuned and sensors shut off and all that in the next couple of days. Thanks for the help.
Old 12-12-2009, 05:48 PM
  #4  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
ChevyMan90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Central, Louisiana
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think I'm going to be doing the Y-Pipe setup into a Single Magnaflow but I have one more question. From the Y that I will be making should I run 3 inch all the way to the muffler or would 2.5 be better? I don't wanna go to big but I don't want to restrict it either. Thanks
Old 12-12-2009, 08:47 PM
  #5  
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
budhayes3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hackensack, NJ
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ChevyMan90
I think I'm going to be doing the Y-Pipe setup into a Single Magnaflow but I have one more question. From the Y that I will be making should I run 3 inch all the way to the muffler or would 2.5 be better? I don't wanna go to big but I don't want to restrict it either. Thanks
If running a single pipe, go with 3", if duals do 2.5"
Old 12-12-2009, 10:11 PM
  #6  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
ChevyMan90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Central, Louisiana
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks man. I was hoping I'd hear from one of you guys. I did a little searching in google and most of the single catback systems are 3 inch, but glad I got a response from someone on here. I'll try to post some pics once I start making progress.
Old 12-12-2009, 10:59 PM
  #7  
TECH Resident
 
006rcsb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: bakersfield, ca
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i had heard that shortys were a decent upgrade from the manifolds on the old 5.7's...
Old 12-12-2009, 11:06 PM
  #8  
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
budhayes3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hackensack, NJ
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 006rcsb
i had heard that shortys were a decent upgrade from the manifolds on the old 5.7's...
Yea, I believe that they show more gains on the older gen sbc's than they do on the GENIII-IV's...I think that part of it, besides the combustion chamber/valve design, is that the older gen exhaust manifolds were fairly restrictive compared to the newer ones
Old 12-12-2009, 11:22 PM
  #9  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
ChevyMan90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Central, Louisiana
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well I can personally say that I felt a difference in power throughout the entire powerband after installing them. I agree with you both because the factory manifolds on the newer trucks with 5.3's and 4.8's are almost a shorty design. (Each cylinder has its own port). They even look like they would flow better. My factory manifolds don't look like they would flow near as well as those would. Everywhere I read on here says go longtubes and I agree that there is probably more power gains, but I was impressed with what I got out of these shorties.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
thompson
Sponsor's Announcements, Sales, and Specials
2
12-27-2017 06:48 AM
bearden86
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
26
11-15-2015 03:58 PM
JordanH
FORCED INDUCTION
4
10-03-2015 03:59 PM
carid
Sponsor's Announcements, Sales, and Specials
0
10-01-2015 09:22 AM
Raiderjim
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
14
09-26-2015 10:18 PM



Quick Reply: So Many Choices.....What Will Give me the Best of Both?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:46 AM.