so why to they say it is too big...
#52
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: OK
Posts: 3,895
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm sure a RCSB will benefit greatly from a higher speed stall since it weighs less.
#54
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Zachary,Louisiana
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thanks for the feedback, i planned on running a 3600 but might do a 3400, thats not a bad time being u have a a smaller stall and 3.73s. there was another guy on here with a 2wd and ran like a 12.8, i kno he had 4.10s and a fuddle 3000, but i figured the stall flashed higher than 3000, he had some weight reduction though
#55
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
Best run was a 14.68 @ 93.6 mph in full street weight. I don't have any good runs in with the TBSS intake yet. I went once after I put it on, but found I was having problems with the TB. I would like to be able to improve my 60' times some. About the best I've been able to get is 2.1, but for my daily driver that may need to pull a trailer at any time I don't really want a bigger stall.
I'm sure a RCSB will benefit greatly from a higher speed stall since it weighs less.
I'm sure a RCSB will benefit greatly from a higher speed stall since it weighs less.
#56
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Zachary,Louisiana
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yea i just sold my ls1 i had because i would go through trannies quicker than i go through tires,lol. i was given the cam and i dont want a 6.0 now, i dont have a problem rollin with the 5.3 til i graduate, they got plenty of fast 5.3s and i wouldn't mind telling ppl they lost to a 5.3,lol. thanks for the thought